[2025:RJ-JP:43730] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16442/2025 Sushil Bajya S/o Radha Kishan, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Bajya Ki Dhani Akeli-B, Tehsil Degana District Nagaur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Government Secretariat Rajasthan, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. The Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner. 3. The District Election Officer (Collector), Deedwana, Kuchaman 4. The Election Registration Officer (Sdm), Makrana District Deedwana Kuchaman. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sandeep Kalwaniya For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 31/10/2025 1. Learned counsel for petitioner while referring order dated 04.09.2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13367/2025 (Bharat Singh Yadav Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors.) and order dated 23.09.2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14524/2025 (Vinita Kumari Vs. The State of Rajasthan and Ors.) and submits that the controversy raised herein is decided by a Co-ordinate bench of this Hon’ble Court at Principal Seat, Jodhpur in case of Ten Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12975/2025) and present writ petition may be disposed of accordingly. [2025:RJ-JP:43730] (2 of 2) [CW-16442/2025] 3. Having considered the submission of learned counsel for petitioner and on perusal of judgment in case of Bharat Singh Yadav Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors (supra), Vinita Kumari Vs. The State of Rajasthan (supra) and Ten Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan (supra), writ petition may be disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh representation within a period of 4 weeks from today. 4. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to respondents within a period of four weeks from now raising all grounds. The respondents are directed to decide the representation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 4 weeks from date of receipt of representation, in light of ratio laid down in case of Ten Singh (supra). After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he has a right to re-approach the court with fresh petition. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /80