\ IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY ,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 4081 OF 2013 Between: 1. Sri J.Appala Raju, H.M.V. Driver, APTDC., S/o Nooka Raju, aged about 37 years, R/o D.No.44-31-81/1/3, Lakshmi Nagar, Kailasapuram, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam Dist. 2. Sri Yerra Srinu, H.M.V. Driver, APTDC., S/o Somu Naidu, aged about 36 years, R/o Kanamam Village, Sontyam Post, Anandhapuram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. 3. Sri Yerra Satyanarayana, H.M.V. Driver, APTDC., S/o Venkata Ramana, aged about 35 years, R/o Bapadupalem Village, Bharanakam Post, Paravada Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. 4. Sri Rajana Raja Sekharam, H.M.V.Driver, APTDC., S/o Ramulu, aged about 35 years, R/o D.No.32-117/15, Borada Street, Belagam Post, Parvathipuram Mandal, Vizianagaram District. 5. Sri K.Rajendar Reddy, H.M.V.Driver, APTDC., S/o Bal Reddy, aged about 35 years, Rio H.No.8-7-98/84/181, Venkateswar Colony, Hastinapuram, R.R.District. 6. Sri S.Murali Krishna, S/o Shankaraiah, aged about 42 years, R/o H.No.3-9-554, Plot No.98/A, Mansoorabad,R.R.District. Veerabogavasanthrai Nagar, 7. Sri M.V.Rukma Reddy, S/o M.Madhava Reddy, aged about H.No.8-7-98/84/181 42 years, Venkateswar Colony, Hastinapuram, R/o R.R. District. ...Petitioners AND 1. The Government of A.P. Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. rep. by its Secretary, Finance and Planning 2. A.P. Tourism Development Corporation Ltd. Rep. by its Managing Director, 3-5-891, Tourism House, Himayathnagar, Hyderabad-29. 3. A.P. Tourism Development Corporation Ltd., Director, 3-5-891, Tourism House, Himayathnagar, Hyderabad-29. Rep. by its Executive 4. A.P. Tourism Development Corporation Ltd. Rep. by its General Manager, 3-5-891, Tourism House, Himayathnagar, Hyderabad-29. 5. A.P. Tourism Deveiopment Corporation Ltd., Rep. by its Transport 5-1-431/A, Hyderbasthi, Ranigunj, Manager, Transport Division Secunderabad. 6. A.P.Tourism Development Corporation Ltd. Manager, Transport Division, Krupam Enclave, Visakhapatnam. Rep. by its Transport Pedda Waltair, ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in not regularizing the services of the petitioners though they have compieted more then 240 days of services under Section 25-B of I.D.Act, 1947 and riot fixing the wages of the petitioners on par with the regular Drivers of the respondent Corporation is illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory and violation of Art. 14, 16 of the Constitution of India, 1950, consequently direct the respondents to fix the time scale of the petitioners on par with the regular Drivers of the respondent Corporation. LA. NO: 1 OF 2013fWPMP. NO: 5094 OF 2013) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to fix the time scale of the petitioners on par with the regular Drivers of the respondent Corporation, pending disposal of the Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI S.A.K. MYNUDDIN Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING Counsel for the Respondent No.2 to 6: SRI HANUMANTHA RAO bachina, sc for APTDC The Court made the following: APHC010258442013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE ^ PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA WRIT PETITION NO: 4n«l/9nn 0^' PRADESH [3330] RAJASEKHAR RAO Between: Sri J.Appala Raju and others ...PETITIONER(S) AND The Government of A.P. and others Counsel for the Petitioner{S): 1.S A K MYNUDDIN Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING 2.HANUMANTHA RAO BACHINA 3.GPFOR SERVICES I 4.A K NARASIMHA RAO The Court made the follnwing- ...RESPONDENT(S) J, f r \ i 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO. 4081 of 2013 ORDER: Despite the matter listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation for the petitioners. It evinces that the petitioners have no interest in prosecuting their case. Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any shall stand closed. Sd/- G HELA NAIDU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTIOW^^ICER / To, I -- 1 One CC to SRI S A K MYNUDDIN, Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCS to GP FOR SERVICES I. High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 3. One CC to SRI HANUMANTHA RAO BACHINA, STANDING COUNSEL FOR APTDC [OPUC] 4. Two CCS to GP FOR FINANCE AND PLANNING, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 5. Three CD Copies sree high court DATED:25/04/2025 \ ORDER WP.No.4081 of 2013 ANOfl^ 5 13 JUN 2035 ^ . Curreni decuun . , dismissing the w non-prosecution' P. FOR WITHOUT COSTS