210-2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRR-1494-2010 Date of decision: 21.04.2025 Sushila Devi ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Present: Mr. J.P. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ramesh Kumar Ambavta, AAG, Haryana. Ms. Deepika, Advocate for respondents No.2 & 3. HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J. (ORAL) The present revision petition has been filed for enhancement of sentence awarded by the learned Sessions Judge, Narnaul to respondents No.2 & 3. Learned counsel for respondents No.2 & 3 submits that respondents No.2 & 3 have unfortunately died during the pendency of the present revision petition and as such, the same has become infructuous. In view of the above, the present revision petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. (HARPREET SINGH BRAR) JUDGE 21.04.2025 Neha Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No Neha 2025.04.23 10:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document