Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4453 (UTT)

HARISH BAMBA v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/558/2020 · 2025-06-26

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.558 of 2020 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Alok Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. Mr. S.C. Dumka, learned AGA along with Ms. Sweta Badola Dobhal, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. Mr. Kaushal Sah Jagati, learned counsel for respondent no.3. 4. Learned State Counsel supplied instructions dated 11.06.2025 to the Court, which are taken on record. On instructions, he submits that after investigation, charge-sheet has been filed against the petitioner nos.1 & 2 on 10.07.2020 while petitioner nos.3 & 4 have been exonerated. 5. In view of the statement made by learned State Counsel, writ petition has rendered infructuous. Accordingly, the same is dismissed as such. 6. However, it is open to the charge-sheeted petitioners to challenge the charge-sheet, if so advised, in appropriate proceedings before the appropriate forum. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 26.06.2025 AK