Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 44529 (RAJ)

SURENDRA NAGAR SON OF CHANDRAPRAKASH NAGAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/13314/2025 · 2025-10-06

Ashok Kumar Jain

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13165/2025 1. Kamal Singh, S/o Rajpal Singh Pundir, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Jawaher Colony Perbatpura, Ajmer, Rajasthan. 2. Mohit Bhati, S/o Vinod Kumar Bhati, Aged About 26 Years, R/o 643/28, Ashirwad Villa, Shringhar, Chauri, Bihari Gaanj, Ajmer, Rajasthan. 3. Rohit Meghwanshi, S/o Bhanwar Lal Meghwanshi, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Balaji Ki Dungari Ke Pass, Sanwatsar Kishangarh, Ajmer, Rajasthan. 4. Hemant Gupta, S/o Chandra Bhan Gupta, Aged About 54 Years, R/o Q No. 93, Block-B Chandravardai Nagar Ajmer, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department Of Technical Education, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan). 2. The Director (Training), Directorate Of Technical Education, Rajasthan, Jodhpur. 3. The Deputy Director (Training), Government Institutional Training Institute, Ajmer. 4. The Principal, Govt. Industrial Training Institute, Ajmer. ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13314/2025 1. Surendra Nagar Son Of Chandraprakash Nagar, Aged About 35 Years, Resident Of Village Haripura, Tehsil Sangod, District Kota (Raj.) 2. Dinesh Suman Son Of Chaturbhuj Suman, Aged About 28 Years, Resident Of Village Khanpur, District Jhalawar (Raj.) 3. Bharat Raj Suman Son Of Radheshyam Suman, Aged About 29 Years, Resident Of Vpo- Dhulet, Tehsil Kanwas, District Kota (Raj.) 4. Bintesh Kumar Gaur Son Of Bhanwar Lal Gaur, Aged About 38 Years, Resident Of Village Jogda, Post Hingi, [2025:RJ-JP:40385] (2 of 3) [CW-13165/2025] Tehsil Sangod, District Kota (Raj.) 5. Priyanka Kushwaha D/o Premprakash Kushwaha, Aged About 23 Years, Resident Of Sangod, Kota (Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Skill Planning And Entreprenueurship Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. (Raj.) 2. The Director, Directorate Of Technical Education, (Training, E-6, Residence Road, Jodhpur (Raj.) 3. The Superintendent Cum Principal, Government Industrial Training Institute, Khanpur, District Jhalawar. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini with Mr. Aamir Khan Mr. G.S. Gouttam For Respondent(s) : Ms. Mahi Yadav, AAG with Mr. Kuldeep Singh Rathore Mr. Vishnu Dutt Sharma, AAAG for Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 06/10/2025 S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13165/2025: 1. Learned counsel for petitioner offers to withdraw instant writ petition, hence, same is dismissed as withdrawn with pending application, if any. S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13314/2025: 1. Considered submissions of learned counsel for petitioners and learned AAG. 2. The writ petition is allowed in terms of order dated 19.09.2025 in D.B. Special (Appeal) Writ No.903/2023 supported [2025:RJ-JP:40385] (3 of 3) [CW-13165/2025] with judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court in case of Manish Gupta and Ors. Vs. President, Jan Bhagidari Samiti and Ors. Reported in 2022 (15) SCC 540 in following terms: “(1) The petitioners/applicants are entitled to continue on their respective posts (guest faculty) till they are replaced by existing regular employees or regularly selected candidate(s). (2) The petitioners/applicants would be continued as guest faculty provided that sufficient number of students are available for the particular courses(s) for which they were engaged. (3)The petitioners/applicants would be entitled to honorarium at the rate to be determined from time to time but not lower than being paid to them presently or to be modified by the State from time to time.” 3. See separate order. 4. Accordingly, civil writ petition is disposed of with pending application, if any. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /36-37