IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 105 Ali Sher Gurkirat Kirpal Singh, and Justice, Punjab and others CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) proceedings Superintendent of Police, Malerkotla dated 27.1.2025 Court in CRWP others”, vide which direction was issued to respondent No.2 Superintendent of Police, Malerkotla, that representation, as indicated above, is that shall be dealt with expeditiously in accordance with law by passing a speaking order preferably within a period of one month from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and convey the same to the petitioner.” COCP-1874-2025 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.1874 of 2025 Date of decision : Versus Gurkirat Kirpal Singh, Secretary, Department of Home Affairs and Justice, Punjab and others CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Vicky Singh Toor, Advocate for Mr. Imran Farooqi, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Manmeet Singh Teji, AAG NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that proceedings be initiated against respondent Superintendent of Police, Malerkotla for not complying the order 27.1.2025 (Annexure P-1) passed by a c CRWP-800-2025 titled as “Ali Sher vs. State of Punjab and others”, vide which direction was issued to respondent No.2 Superintendent of Police, Malerkotla, that representation, as indicated above, is indeed pending consideration, that shall be dealt with expeditiously in accordance with law by passing a speaking order preferably within a period of one month from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and convey the same to the petitioner.” 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 1874 of 2025 (O & M) Date of decision :-29.05.2025 …..Petitioner Secretary, Department of Home Affairs …..Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Vicky Singh Toor, Advocate for Mr. Imran Farooqi, Advocate Mr. Manmeet Singh Teji, AAG Punjab. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that contempt against respondent No.2-Senior for not complying the order 1) passed by a co-ordinate Bench of this Ali Sher vs. State of Punjab and others”, vide which direction was issued to respondent No.2-Senior Superintendent of Police, Malerkotla, that “…if any such indeed pending consideration, that shall be dealt with expeditiously in accordance with law by passing a speaking order preferably within a period of one month from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and convey the VIJAY ASIJA 2025.05.29 19.11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Compliance Report dated 11.5.2025 filed by way of affidavit of Shri Gagan Ajit Singh, PPS, Senior Superintendent of Police, District Malerkotla and submits that necessary compliance has been made, while passing a speaking order dated 18.2.2025 (Annexure R annexed with the Compliance Report) by respondent No.2 Superintendent of Police, Malerkotla; thus, no cause survives in the present petition. produced by the learned counsel for the respondent the Registry on the file, is taken on record. Copy thereof is supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner. Registry to tag/paginate the same at appropriate place in the paper does not press the present petition any further. May 29, 202 Vijay Asija Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No COCP-1874-2025 (O & M) Learned counsel for the respondent Compliance Report dated 11.5.2025 filed by way of affidavit of Shri Gagan Ajit Singh, PPS, Senior Superintendent of Police, District Malerkotla and submits that necessary compliance has been made, ile passing a speaking order dated 18.2.2025 (Annexure R annexed with the Compliance Report) by respondent No.2 Superintendent of Police, Malerkotla; thus, no cause survives in the present petition. Copy of the aforesaid Compliance Report, alread produced by the learned counsel for the respondent the Registry on the file, is taken on record. Copy thereof is supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner. Registry to tag/paginate the same at appropriate place in the paper-book. In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition any further. Dismissed as not pressed. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. , 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No 2 Learned counsel for the respondent-State refers to the Compliance Report dated 11.5.2025 filed by way of affidavit of Shri Gagan Ajit Singh, PPS, Senior Superintendent of Police, District Malerkotla and submits that necessary compliance has been made, ile passing a speaking order dated 18.2.2025 (Annexure R-1 annexed with the Compliance Report) by respondent No.2-Senior Superintendent of Police, Malerkotla; thus, no cause survives in the Copy of the aforesaid Compliance Report, already produced by the learned counsel for the respondent-State, annexed by the Registry on the file, is taken on record. Copy thereof is supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner. Registry to tag/paginate the same In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition any further. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2025.05.29 19.11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document