I . IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARA^ (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE ^ Joe Cl /*> PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 17215 OF 2024 Between: Koduri Pavan Kumar, S/o. Demudu, Aged about 34 years, R/o. Q.No. 49/G, Marripalem Railway Quarters, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District. ...PETITIONER AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Department of Home, AP Secretariat Buildings, Velgapudi, Guntur District. 2. The Director General of Police, State of Andhra Pradesh DGP Office, Amaravati, Guntur District 3. The Commissioner of Police, Suryabagh, Visakhapatnam District- 530001 4. Deputy Commissioner of Police, Suryabagh, Visakhapatnam District- 530001 5. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, North Sub-Division, Visakahapatnam City. 6. The Station House officer, Kancharapalem Police Station, Visakhaptnam District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the one Respondents in opening and continuing the Rowdy sheet against me vide C.No.120/ACP-N/Genl/07, Dated 30-11-2007 as illegal, arbitrary and in violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to quash the same the Rowdy Sheet opened against me. lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents not to call the Petitioner to the Police Station in connection with Rowdy-sheet opened vide Proceedings of the rowdy-sheet opened against the Petitioner vide Proceedings of Kancharaplem Police Station which was come under Visakhapatnam Commissionerate, Commissioner Police, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District, C.No.120/ACP-N/Genl/07, Dated 30-11-2007 and not to interfere in their Right to life and personal liberty Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI PULAMARASETTI RAMALINGESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 6: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER f APHC010338382024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] FRIDAY ,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 17215/2024 Between: Koduru Pavan Kumar ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Ap and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: ...RESPONDENT(S) 1.PULAMARASETTI RAMALINGESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: II2II WP.No.17215 of 2024 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH. N WRIT PETITION No.17215 of 2024 ORDER: i 1. The petitioner is challenging the in-action on part of the respondents in closing the rowdy sheet which was opened vide proceedings C.No.120/ACP-N/Genl/07, dated 30.11.2007 against the petitioner. 2. The petitioner was shown as Accused No.1 in SC.No.21 of 2009 and the petitioner was acquitted vide judgment dated 31.10.2011 by the learned Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Visakhapatnam and Accused No.1 in SC.No.850 of 2009 and the petitioner acquitted vide judgment dated 14.12.2012 by the learned II Additional chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Visakhapatnam. was 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondents have not closed the rowdy sheet though there is no case pending for a period of five years from the date of opening of the rowdy sheet against the petitioner. It is submitted that the only case which is pending against the petitioner does not come under the schedule of offences which would enable the respondents to maintain the rowdy sheet. 4. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that continuation of rowdy sheet against the petitioner is also a social WP.No.17215of 2024 ♦- sigma on the petitioner. It is also submitted that continuation of the rowdy sheet against the petitioner without any valid reason amounts to interfering with the fundamental rights of the petitioner i.e., right to live with dignity and the right guaranteed under Article 19(1)(d). 5. The learned Assistant Government Pleader representing the respondents submits that the Police Standing Orders 602(2) clearly mentioned that nothing precludes the SP/DCP/CP from continuing a rowdy sheet on the sole ground that the rowdy sheeter is not figuring as an accused in the previous five years. It would depend upon the nature of the activities of the rowdy sheeter for continuing the suspect sheet to enable peace and tranquility in the society. 6. The learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the state does not dispute that there are no cases pending against the petitioner; however submits that the petitioner’s activities would require continuous surveillance for the police to maintain the law and order in the state. 7. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for the state and perused the material on record. UAH WP.No.17215of2024 8. The following questions would fall for consideration of these petitions ; writ 'i I. Whether the fundamental right under Article 19(1)(d) of a Citizen is infringed upon on account of continued surveillance under the guise of opening and continuing rowdy sheet ? The scope of judicial review of rowdy sheet / rowdy sheet on the touchstone of reasonableness, arbitrariness and non-application of mind ? II. 9. It is also not in dispute that the petitioner was not convicted of any offence(s). The stand taken by the respondents, that the Police Standing Orders would empower the respondents to rowdy sheets/rowdy sheets in order to maintain law and order i: not an unfettered right. The Police Standing Orders do not have statutory force. The standing orders are only administrative instructions. It is also not in dispute that the Police Standing Orders which are issued under the Police Act would have statutory force. open IS 10. It is pertinent to refer to Chapter 31 of the A.P. Police Code which contains 24 Standing Orders. They deal with the Station Crime history. Standing Orders 733 to 741 and Standing Order 749 deal with Rowdy sheets. Standing Order 742 deals with rowdy sheets. Standing Orders 733 to 737 relating to rowdy sheets reads as follows : WP.No.17215of 2024 "S.O. 733. Part V-Rowdy sheets:- Part V consists of Rowdy sheet (Form 87) of persons resident permanently or temporarily in the station limits, who are known or believed to be addicted to or to aid and abet the commission of crime, whether convicted or not, or who are believed to be habitual receivers. S.O. 734. Automatic opening of Rowdy sheets; (1) Rowdy sheets shall be opened automatically at the time of conviction for persons convicted as under and shall be retained for two years after release from jail. (2) Persons convicted as above will be styled 'known depredators'. However, inmates or ex-inmates of Borstal Institution should not be styled as 'known depredators'. (3) Rowdy sheets should be opened for such of those registered ex-notified tribe members under Order 736, for whom the Superintendent of Police or the Sub-Divisional Officer thinks it advisable to do so on account of their active criminality. (4) The Rowdy sheet of a known depredator, against whom an order has been passed Under Section 556 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 (Act No. 2 of 1974) shall not be closed until the period during which he is required to report changes of residence has elapsed. (G.O.Ms.No. 332 Judl. Dated: 20-2-1906 and 497 Law General dated 10-2-1923). S.O.735. Discontinuance of Rowdy sheets: (1) Rowdy sheet shall be closed by the definite orders of a Gazetted Officer and shall be filed in the Station. The Rowdy sheets of persons, who have died shall be destroyed by the order of a Gazetted Officer. The Superintendent of Police may order the closure of Rowdy sheet at any time, but a Sub-Divisional Officer may only do so on the expiry of the period named above. (2) Where the retention of a rowdy sheet is considered necessary after two years of registration. WP.No.17215of 2024 orders of a Gazetted Officer must be taken for the end of the next December, and for further annual shnuM^f' The following persons h ^ as suspects and rowdy sheets shall be opened for them under the orders of the Superintendent of Police or Sub-Diuislonal Officer Mian'''pLl"?ode"'''?®'' 'he nnJf to 3''® considered likelv to commit Crime again; and ^ ° (b) persons not addicted to crime. (2) Care should be taken to see that rowdy sheets are opened under this order only for persons who are likely to turn out to be habitual criminal and therefore required to be closely watched. S.0.737. Period of retention of Rowdy sheets nf suspects: Rowdy sheets of suspects shaT be maintained from the date of registration upto the end of December, after which the orders of a Gazetted Officer as to their discontinuance or retention for a H^m^TsTlotoj' ^929 14. A reading of the Standing conclusions; 'i convicted but believed to be Orders leads to the following a) A police station has to open Rowdy sheet But°th? conviction of a person. But the conviction is not for all offences When a RMq°ip'^ convicted once Under 310(2) to 310(5) BNS (Previously Sections 395 to 402 IPC) person is convicted twice for house breaking or theft *28 of BNSsTr, Unde? Section (previously Section 109 of the Code of Criminal Procedure), and bound Police are empowered to of , when a over once the open rowdy sheet. Besides inii WP.No.17215of2024 these, persons who are convicted for offences relating to coins and Government Stamps and persons convicted twice for the offences like theft and house breaking and professional prisoners are also the persons against whom rowdy sheet can be automatically opened by the police. Rowdy sheets can also be opened even if there is no conviction. But in such case the person should have been known or believed to be addicted to, or aid or abet the commission of a crime. The Rowdy sheet opened shall be continued and maintained only for a period of two years and shall be closed only on definite orders of Gazetted Officer. The Police may however order closure of the Rowdy sheet at any time (PSO 735). The Rowdy sheet can be continued and maintained for further period of one year till the end of December, but such continuance can be on specific orders of a Gazetted Officer who after considering the case comes to conclusion that it is necessary to continue the Rowdy sheet and extend retention of the Rowdy sheet. Annual extensions for continuation of Rowdy sheet can also be given from January to December, (PSOs. 735 and 737). The police may also open rowdy sheets for suspects. Suspects are those persons who are convicted under any section of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and who are considered likely to commit crime again. Persons who are not convicted but are believed to be addicted to crime are also treated as suspects. In case a Rowdy sheet is opened on the ground that a person is a suspect care should be taken that Rowdy sheets are opened only for persons who are likely to become habitual criminals (PSO 736). 11. The police after opening rowdy sheets would constantly keep the b) c) d) e) rowdy sheeter under their radar of surveillance. The same would restrict the free movement of the said citizen. WP.No.17215of2024 12. The Hon ble Supreme Court in the matter of Kharaksingh Vs. The State of U.P and others'' had dealt with this issue and duly considering the law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras^ case set aside the suspect sheet by holding that such illogical acts without adequate and justifiable reasons which is infringe upon the fundamental rights of the petitioner therein. 13. On the facts of the present case, the continuance of rowdy sheet against the petitioner would amount to illegal surveillances which is an arbitrary act on part of the state. The same includes the right to privacy and violates Article 21 of the Constitution of India. At the same time, it is made clear that keeping a person under watch to prevent crime and to maintain law and order authorizedby law is a reasonablerestriction which is permissible under the Constitution of India. as 14. There is no justification in continuation of the rowdy sheet against the petitioner, more so when there registered against the petitioner for a period of five years from the date of opening of the rowdy sheet. The pending was no case case ^ 1963 AIR Supreme Court 1295 2 AIR 1950 sc 27 WP.No.17215 of 2024 against the petitioner would also not warrant continuance of the rowdy sheet against the petitioner. 15. For the aforementioned reasons, the writ petition is allowed. A is issued to the respondents and to their subordinates to close the proceedings vide C.N0.I20/ACP- N/Genl/07, dated 30.11.2007. mandamus 16. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. SD/-G. HELA NAIDU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECT! OFFICER To, 1. The Principal Secretary, Department of Home, State of Andhra Pradesh, AP Secretariat Buildings, Velgapudi, Guntur District. 2. The Director General of Police, State of Andhra Pradesh DGP Office, Amaravati, Guntur District 3. The Commissioner of Police, Suryabagh, Visakhapatnam District- 530001 4. Deputy Commissioner of Police, Suryabagh, Visakhapatnam District- 530001 5. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, North Sub-Division, Visakahapatnam City. 6. The Station House officer, Kancharapalem Police Station, Visakhaptnam District. 7. One CC to Sri Pulamarasetti Ramalingeswara Rao, Advocate [OPUC] 8. Two CCs to GP for Home, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 9. Three CD Copies. ssb HIGH COURT DATED;28/03/2025 ORDER WP.No.17215 of 2024 ALLOWING THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS