-1- 2025:CGHC:2765 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCC No. 35 of 2023 1 - Usha Bai W/o Late Ishwar Singh Aged About 62 Years Caste- Kshatri, R/o Village Gidha Tahsil Mungeli, District : Mungeli, Chhattisgarh 2 - Rajesh Singh S/o Late Ishwar Singh Aged About 42 Years Caste- Kshatri, R/o Village Gidha Tahsil Mungeli, District : Mungeli, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Mahendra Singh S/o Late Ishwar Singh Aged About 37 Years Caste- Kshatri, R/o Village Gidha Tahsil Mungeli, District : Mungeli, Chhattisgarh 4 - Jitendra Singh S/o Late Ishwar Singh Aged About 37 Years Caste- Kshatri, R/o Village Gidha Tahsil Mungeli, District : Mungeli, Chhattisgarh. 5 - Madhu Singh W/o Late Durga Singh Aged About 47 Years Caste- Kshatri, R/o Village Gidha Tahsil Mungeli, District : Mungeli, Chhattisgarh ---- Applicants Versus 1 - Milaukeen Bai W/o Late Ishwar Singh Aged About 60 Years Caste- Kshatri. R/o Village Rohrakhurd, Tahsil- Mungeli, District : Mungeli, Chhattisgarh 2 - Rajkumar Singh D/o Late Ishwar Singh Aged About 24 Years Caste-Kshatri, R/o Village Rohrakhurd, Tahsil Mungeli, District : Mungeli, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Kaushilya Bai D/o Late Ishwar Singh Aged About 28 Years Caste-Kshatri, R/o Village Rohrakhurd, Tahsil Mungeli, District : Mungeli, Chhattisgarh. Digitally signed by VIJAY BHARATRAO PEKDE Date: 2025.01.16 17:50:28 +0530 -2- 4 - Sangeeta Bai D/o Late Ishwar Singh Aged About 26 Years Caste-Kshatri, R/o Village Rohrakhurd, Tahsil Mungeli, District : Mungeli, Chhattisgarh. 5 - Jila Shiksha Adhikari Mungeli, District : Mungeli, Chhattisgarh. 6 - Branch Manager State Bank Of India, Branch Mungeli, District : Mungeli, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Applicants : Mr. Vijay Kumar Mishra and Mr. K.K. Khatri, Advocates. For Res. No. 5 & 6/State: Mr. Devesh G. Kela, Advocate. Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey Order on Board 16.01.2025 1. Heard Mr. Vijay Kumar Mishra and Mr. K.K. Khatri, learned counsel for the applicants. Also heard Mr. Devesh G. Kela, P.L. for the State. 2. The present MCC has been filed by the applicants for restoration of C.R. No.133/2018, which was dismissed for want of prosecution on 11.11.2022. 3. For the reason mentioned in the application, same is allowed and C.R. No.133/2018, which was dismissed for want of prosecution on 11.11.2022 be restored in its original number, subject to payment of cost of Rs.3,000/- to the High -3- Court Legal Services Committee. Sd/- (Rajani Dubey) Judge pekde