IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 7704 OF 2025 Between; 1. Valivarthi Sundra Rama Raju. S/o Kotam Raju, Occ Retired Railway employee, Aged about 76 years.D.No. 20-2-6, 1st lane, Ayodhya Nagar, Vijayawada city. 2. Uppalapati Venkata Samba Siva Hari Varma, S/o Ramachandra Bank Employee, Aged about 59 years.D.No. 20-2-6 Nagar, Vijayawada city. 3. Uppalapati Sai Sowmya, W/oi:Dandu Jayanth, D/o Uppalapati Venkata Samba Siva Hari Varma, Occupation Chartered Accountant D.No. 20-2-6, 1st lane, Ayodhya Nagar, Vijayawada city. Raju, Occ 1st lane, Ayodhya ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Bapatia District at Bapatla. 3. Karlapalem Station, Represented by its Station House Officer, Karlapalem Bapatla District. 4. The Sub Inspector of Police, KarlapalemPolice Station, Karlapalem, Bapatla District. , 5. Manthena Rajam Raju, S/o Sivaji Raju, R/o BuddamVillage, KarlapalemMandal, Bapatia District. Presently residing at Bapatia Town.BapatIa District. 6. Dandu Jayanth, S/o Dandu Satya Narayana Raju, Aged about 34 years R/o D.No. 9-56, Alakapuram village, Pittalavanipalem mandal, Bapatia District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No. 3,4 and their staff in calling the petitioners to the 3rd respondent police station at the behest of the 5th and 6th respondents in connection with a purely civil transaction of the year 2022 between the 1st petitioner and 5th respondent, and directing the petitioner to settle the matrimonial disputes with the 6th respondent or else face false criminal case as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondent No. 3, 4 and their staff not to interfere with life and liberty of the petitioners by calling them to the 3rd respondent P.S without following due process of law and make such illegal demands and threats, while directing the 2nd respondent to take departmental action against the erring officials. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be f / pleased to direct the 3, 4 respondents and their staff not to interfere with life and liberty of the petitioners by calling them to the police station. Counsel for the Petitloner(s):SRI SASANKA BHUVANAGIRI Counsel for the Respondents No.1 to 4: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondents No.5,6; — The Court made the following: ORDER / APHC010146152025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] / THURSDAY ,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 7704/2025 Between: Valivarthi Sundra Rama Raju and Others AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitloner(S): 1.SASANKA BHUVANAGIRI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ...PETITIONER(S) ...RESPONDENT(S) THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION No.7704 OF 2025 ORDER: 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the State. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are aggrieved by the interference of the 4’Vespondent at the behest of the respondents 5 and 6 in the civil disputes and are repeatedly calling the petitioners to the police station. 3. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Assistant Government Pleader, 4'” respondent, on receipt of the complaint dated on written instructions, submits the 10.03.2025, called the petitioner to the police station. After realising that the complaint was civil in nature, the parties were advised to approach the civil court. 4. Recording the same the writ petition is closed. No costs. 5. Miscellaneous petitions, if stand closed. any, pending in the w^^if^tion shall Sd/- SHAIK MOHD. RAFI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. One CC to SRI SASANKA BHUVANAGIRl, Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP FOR HOME, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 3. Three C.D. Copies nm HIGH COURT DATED :27/03/2025 ORDER WP.No.7704 of 2025 CLOSING THE WP WITHOUT COSTS