HIMMAT SINGH TUNGAD S/O SHRI SHIVCHARAN TUNGAD v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/6382/2025 · 2025-11-27
Anoop Kumar Dhand
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44503 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44503 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:48276] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 6382/2025
1. Himmat Singh Tungad S/o Shri Shivcharan Tungad, R/o Village- Vijaypura, Post-Kolwa, District-Dausa, Rajasthan.
2. Vinod Gurjar S/o Shri Lalchand Gurjar, R/o Village -Shivpura, Khavranji, District-Jaipur, Rajasthan ----Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
2. Satveer Gurjar S/o Shri Ummed Singh Gurjar, Aged About 26 Years, Village-Paadli, Tehsil Dausa, District-Dausa, Rajastahn ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Hemant kankoriya For Respondent(s) : Mr.Vivek Choudhary, PP Mr.Devi Singh, PP Mr.Farooq Ahmed JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Order 27/11/2025
1. By way of filing the instant criminal misc. petition, a prayer has been made for quashing of F.I.R. No.210/2025 registered at the Police Station Bajaj Nagar, District Jaipur City (East) under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 189(2) & 134 of the BNS, 2023 on the basis of the compromise arrived at between the parties.
2. This Court vide order dated 06.11.2025 directed the parties to appear before the Investigating Officer to verify the factum of compromise and in pursuance of the aforesaid order, the Investigating Officer has verified the factum of compromise arrived at between the parties and has furnished his verification report.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioners placed reliance upon the judgments passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Gian
[2025:RJ-JP:48276] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-6382/2025] Singh Vs. State of Punjab reported in 2012 (10) SCC 303 and in the case of The State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Laxmi Narayan reported in 2019 (5) SCC 688. Learned counsel submits that under these circumstances, the proceedings pending against the petitioners may be quashed.
4.
Learned counsel for the respondent-complainant is in agreement with the factum of compromise and states that now, the complainant does not wish to prosecute the petitioners.
5. Heard and considered the submissions made at Bar and perused the material available on the record.
6. Considering the above verification report so furnished by the SHO Police Station Bajaj Nagar, District Jaipur City (East) and applying the principles as laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the cases of Gian Singh (supra) and Laxmi Narayan (supra), this Court deems it just and proper to invoke the inherent powers of this Court contained under Section 528 BNSS.
8. Accordingly, the instant criminal misc. petitions stand allowed. The proceedings arising out of the impugned F.I.R. No.210/2025 registered at Police Station Bajaj Nagar, District Jaipur City (East) against the petitioners stand quashed and set- aside.
9. The stay application and all pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of.
10. The verification report furnished by the concerned SHO is ordered to be taken on record.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Aayush Sharma /41