Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 44502 (RAJ)

SNEH KUMARI W/O SHRI ANGAN LAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/9380/2025 · 2025-11-10

Inderjeet Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:45046] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 4th Bail Application No. 9380/2025 Sneh Kumari W/o Shri Angan Lal, Resident Of Layakpura Ki Dar, Kasiyapura, Police Station Rajakhera, District Dholpur, Rajasthan ( Presently Confined In District Jail Dholpur) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Harendra Singh Sinsinwar. For Respondent(s) For Complainant(s) : : Mr. Sudesh Kumar Saini, Public Prosecutor. Mr. Khushwant. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH Order 10/11/2025 1. The present 4th bail application has been filed under Section 483 B.N.S.S. The applicant has been arrested in connection with FIR No.119/2020 registered at Police Station Rajakhera for the offence(s) under Sections 147, 148, 149, 452 & 302 of IPC and the charge-sheet was filed under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 341, 452 & 302 of IPC. 2. Counsel for the accused-applicant submits that the applicant is a lady and she has been falsely implicated in this matter. Counsel further submits that out of 32 witnesses only 24 witnesses have been examined by the learned Trial Court as yet. Counsel further submits that the applicant is in custody for more than five years and conclusion of trial may take long time. [2025:RJ-JP:45046] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-9380/2025] 3. Learned Public Prosecutor along with counsel for the complainant opposed the bail application. 4. Considering the material on record and taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that out of 32 witnesses only 24 witnesses have been examined by the learned Trial Court as yet and the accused- applicant is a lady and she in custody for more than five years and conclusion of trial may take long time and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this petition is allowed. Applicant be admitted to regular bail subject to satisfaction of the trial Court. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (INDERJEET SINGH),J MG/03