[3329] IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI/f^^^ . (Special Original Jurisdiction) //o WEDNESDAY ,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 11318 OF 2025 * gi ■T,' "1 '-■yy Between: Kommineni Rama Devi, W/o. Linga Rao, Aged about 40 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. D.No.4-76/c, Pulipadu Village, Gurazala Mandal, Palnadu District. ...Petitioner/s AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi. 2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Gurazala Revenue Division, Gurazala, Palnadu District. 3. The Tahsildar, Gurazala Mandal, Palnadu District. ...Respondent/s Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondent No.3 and their officials in trying to dispossess the Petitioner from the land admeasuring Ac.4.00 cents in Sy. No.408/22-AA, situated in Daida Village. Gurazala Mandal, Palnadu District, without conducting any enquiry and without giving an opportunity to the Petitioner to put-forth her case, as illegal, arbitrary, violation of Principles of Natural Justice, violation of Articles 14, 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents not to dispossess land. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 the Petitioner from the subject Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fiied in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents not to dispossess the Petitioner from the land admeasuring Ac.4.00 cents in Sy. No.408/22-AA, situated Village, Gurazala Mandal, Palnadu District. Counsel for the PetitionerSRI. PSP SURESH Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: in Daida KUMAR APHC010229802025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] WEDNESDAY ,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 11318/2025 Between; Kommineni Rama Devi ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.PSPSURESH KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 2 NV,J W.P.N0.11318 OF2025 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 11318/2025 ORDER: 1. The present writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking following relief; to issue a Writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent No.3 and their officials in trying to dispossess the Petitioner from the land admeasuring Ac.4-00 cents in Sy.No.408/22-AA situated in Daida Village, Gurazala Mandal, Palnadu District, without conducting any enquiry and without giving an opportunity to the Petitioner to putforth her case as illegal, arbitrary, violation of Principles of Natural Justice, violation of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents not to dispossess the Petitioner from the subject land and pass... ”(in verbatim) 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Revenue for the respondents. rd 3. During hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that 3 respondent office approached the petitioner on 26.04.2025 and served a notice dated 16.04.2025, stating that the 3''^ respondent intended to conduct an enquiry on the ground that the-sui^ect land is not a private land and it is a Government poramboku land and informed the petitioner to attend enquiry on 02.05.2025. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that without inviting any 4. explanation, the respondents are trying to dispossess the petitioner from the subject property. 3 W.P.NO.11318 OF2025 nt Pleader for Revenue respondent would 5. On the other hand, submits that if the consider the same i 6- In view of the above, petitioner to participate in the learned Assistant Governme petitioner submitted any explanation, the in accordance with law. the writ petition i IS disposed of by directing enquiry pursuant to the notice dated the 16.04.2025 and submit her explanation/proof the subject of documents to substantiate her rights over property. After such submission. the respondents are directed to opportunity if any, in accordance with consider the same and pass appropriate orders after and other stake holders providing an of hearing to the petitioner law. 7. In the meanwhile, the respondents possession of the Consequentiy, miscellaneous are directed not to interfere with the costs, petitions pending, if property of the petitioner. No any, shall also stand closed. Sd/- G. HELA NAIDU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// cll To, SECTION OFFICER 1- The Principal Secretary. Revenue velagapudi, Amaravathi SPECIALMESSENGER) Guraz^a^ PalnarD™^''' division 3- The Tahsildar, Gurazala NOS.2&3 BY READ) Department, Secretariat State of Andhra Pradesh (BY Mandal, Palnadu District. (Addressee [OUT] 6. Three CD Copies Pradesh. HIGH COURT DATED:30/04/2025 ORDER WP.No.11318 of 2025 SEf 2025 W Current Section ^ DISPOSSING THE WRIT PETITIION