Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Meghalaya · body

2025 DAILYLAW 445 (MEG)

BIRANA TYMSEN v. STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND 2 ORS

WP(C)/34/2025 · 2025-03-18

H S Thangkhiew

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 Serial No.18 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG WP(C). No. 34 of 2025 Date of Decision : 18.03.2025 Smti. Birana Tymsen …Petitioner -Versus- 1. The State of Meghalaya Represented by the Chief Secretary. 2. The Deputy Commissioner, East Khasi Hills District, Shillong. 3. National Highways and Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited (NHIDCL), Through the Shillong Regional Office, Parkside Building, Shillong, East Khasi Hills District. …Respondents Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice H.S.Thangkhiew, Judge Appearance: For the Petitioner/Applicant(s) : Mr. L.Syiem, Adv. Mr. K.V.Kharlyngdoh, Adv. For the Respondent(s) : Ms. Z.E.Nongkynrih, GA for R 1&2 Dr. N.Mozika, DSGI with Ms. M.Myrchiang, Adv. for R 3. 2025:MLHC:183 2 i) Whether approved for reporting in Yes/No Law journals etc: ii) Whether approved for publication Yes/No in press: JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL) 1. Mr. L.Syiem, learned counsel for the writ petitioner has submitted at the outset that pursuant to the order dated 17-02-2025, flag marks have been erected where the Mawbris exists and also dumping has since ceased. 2. Dr. N.Mozika, learned DSGI assisted by Ms. M.Myrchiang, learned counsel for the respondent No. 3 has supported this submission and submits that further dumping shall not be done in these areas and the respondent No. 3 shall ensure that the construction does not disturb the Mawbris. 3. On these submissions, the writ petition stands closed and disposed of. 4. It is however provided that for any other reliefs or grievances that might exist, the writ petitioner is at liberty to approach the respondent No. 3 for resolution of the same. Judge 2025:MLHC:183 Digitally signed by SAMANTHA ANNA LIYA RYNJAH Date: 2025.03.18 17:19:43 IST