Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 44495 (MAD)

Kotak Mahindra Prime Limited v. Rajagopal

Arb Appln/558/2025 · 2025-07-08

Abdul Quddhose

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Arb.Appln.No.558 of 2025 M/s.Kotak Mahindra Prime Ltd. ... Applicant Vs. Rajagopal A ... Respondent ABDUL QUDDHOSE.J., The Advocate Commissioner has submitted a report, stating that the vehicle has been repossessed and the custody of the same was handed over to the applicant. 2. This Court directs the applicant to pay an additional remuneration of Rs.20,000/- to the Advocate Commissioner within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 3. The notice sent to the respondent has also been duly served. The affidavit of service has also been filed by the learned counsel for the applicant enclosing the delivery report. Since there is no representation on the side of the respondent, the respondent is set exparte by this Court. Since the vehicle has already been repossessed and the custody of the same has been handed over to the applicant and since the respondent has been set exparte by this Court, this application is closed. 08.07.2025 ab 1/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ABDUL QUDDHOSE.J., ab Arb.Appln.No.558 of 2025 08.07.2025 2/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis