IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY ,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF APRIL (ji TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE - T? & * V- PRESENT : HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA ^ WRIT PETITION NO: 9311 OF 2025 ^ Between: Shaik Abida Khatoon, W/o. late Shaik Mastan Saheb. Aged about Major. Occ House wife, R/o. D. No. and Mandal, Krishna District. 1-26/2, Ambedkar Nagar, Myiavaram lown ...PETITIONER AND 1. The State Of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary Revenue Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. The District Collector, NTR (Krishna) District, Vijayawada. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Vijayawada Revenue Division, NTR (Krishna) District. 4. The Mandal Revenue Officer/Tahsildar, Myiavaram Mandal, NTR (Krishna) District, z' ...RESPONDENTS m Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution the circumstances stated of India praying that in in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may more particularly one in the be pleased to issue a writ order or direction nature of writ of mandamus, declaring the not taking steps against the encroachers action of the 4th respondent in and their structures over the petitioners land admeasuring Ac. 0.59 cents iin Sy. No. 90/1B1 of NTR (Krishna) District is illegal, arbitrary. Mylavaram Village and Mandal ultravires, violation of principles of 300 A of the Constitution respondent No. 09.11.2024. y natural justice and Article 14, 21 and of India and to consequently direct the representation dated to dispose of petitioners lA NO: 1 OF 207.*; Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No. 4 to dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 09.11.2024 initiating appropriate proceedings against the encroachers over the petitioner's land admeasuring Ac. 0.59 cents in Sy. No. 90/1B1 of Mylavaram Village & Mar^dal, NTR (Krishna) District pending disposal of the main writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. RIZWAN ALI Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following Order: SHAIK m ' APHC010178322025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] MONDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 9311/2025 Between: ...PETITIONER Shaik Abida Khatoon AND ...RESPONDENT(S) The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.RIZWAN ALI SHAIK Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 2 m THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU nimmagadda WRIT PETITION NO: 9311/2025 ORDER: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of the India seeking the following reliefs;- “to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declarin^eT ZtlT^ the 4‘^ respondent in not taking steps encroachers and their structures over the petitioner’s land admeasuring Ac. 0.59 cents In Sy.No.90/1B1 of Mylavaram I age and Mandat, NTR (Krishna) District is illeaal of principles of natural justice Article 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and to consequently direct the respondent No. 4 to dispose of and pass such against the 2. Though the petitioner made several allegations against the counsel for the petitioner respondents, during hearing, learned requested this Court, to issue dispose of the a direction to the respondents representation dated 09.11.2024 filed to by the petitioner. 3. Learned Assistant Government furnished the written i stated that the representation dated petitioner is under necessary action will be taken. 4. In view of the submission Government Pleader for Revenue truth or otherwise of the allegations made \ Pleader for Revenue % instructions dated 15.04.2025, wherein it is 09.11.2024 submitted by the enquiry and after completion of the I enquiry of the learned Assistant this Court need not decide the in the petition. This Court 3 IS conscious that judgment of the Apex Court i P.venkatesh”’. wherein the Apex Court held that make for a quick no such direction be issued, in view of the The Government of India v. such orders may cases in overburdened in or easy disposal of adjudicatory institutions. But. justice. As the learned counsel for the a direction to dispose of the - this Court find no other alternative 5. In the result, the writ they do not serve to the cause of petitioner himself requested to i representation dated 09.11.2024, except to issue such direction, petition is disposed of, directing the of the representation dated after providing opportunity of within a period of three (3) months a copy of this order. There shall be issue respondents to consider and dispose 09.11.2024 filed by the petitioner, hearing to the parties concerned, from the date of receipt of order as to costs. no As a sequel miscellaneous application also stand closed. , pending, if any, shall ' 2019 (8) SCALE 544 Sd/- K KASIRAO ACHARl ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Principal Secretary Revenue Department, Secretariat Buildings Velagapudi. Amaravathi, Guntur District. ’ 2. The District Collector, NTR (Krishna) District. Vijayawada. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Vijayawada Ftevenue (Krishna) District. 4. The Mandal Revenue Officer/Tahsildar, Mylavaram Mandal NTR (Krishna) District. 5. One CC to Sri. Rizwan Ali Shaik, Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CCS to GP for REVENUE .High Court Of Andhra 7. Three CD Copies Division, NTR Pradesh. [OUT] vna HIGH COURT DATED:21/04/2025 ORDER WP.No.9311 of 2025 1 13 OCT 2025 i!WiitS«ctio|i^y DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS i