Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 44491 (KAR)

THE VISVESVARAYA TECHNOLOGICAL v. BANK OF INDIA

WP/145573/2020 · 2025-04-04

Jyoti Mulimani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:6031 WP No. 145573 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 145573 OF 2020 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. THE VISVESVARAYA TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY (VTU), AT MACCHE, TQ: AND DIST: BELAGAVI-590 018, THROUGH THE VICE CHANCELLOR, DR. KARISIDDAPPA, THE VISVESVARAYA TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY (VTU). 2. THE VISVESVARAYA TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY (VTU), THROUGH THE REGISTRAR, AT: MACCHE, DR. ANAND SHARAD DESHAPANDE, TQ: AND DIST: BELAGAVI-590 018. … PETITIONERS (BY SRI. RAVEEN.P.TARIKAR., ADVOCATE) AND: BANK OF INDIA, A BODY CORPORATE, CONSTITUTED UNDER THE BANKING COMPANIES (ACQUISITION AND TRANSFER OF UNDERTAKING) ACT, V OF 1970 HAVING ITS HEAD OFFICE AT STAR HOUSE, PLOT NO.C-5, G-BLOCK, BANDRA KURLA COMPLEX, BANDRA, EAST, MUMBAI, AND A BRANCH OFFICE AMONGST OTHER PLACES AT SHAHAPUR, TQ: AND DIST: BELAGAVI, Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:6031 WP No. 145573 of 2020 REPRESENTED BY ITS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER, MR. RAJAN MADHUKAR REGD., SENIOR MANAGER, BANK OF INDIA, AGE: 54 YEARS, OCC: SERVICE, BANK OF INDIA, ZONAL OFFICE AT HUBBALLI, DIST: DHARWAD-580 026. … RESPONDENT (BY SRI. DEEPAK.S.KULKARNI., ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.Praveen P.Tarikar., counsel for the petitioners has appeared in person. 2. Counsel for the petitioners submits that a memo has been filed stating that the Writ Petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. Counsel therefore, submits that the memo may be placed on record and the Writ Petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. 3. When queried, counsel for the petitioners submits that a conscious decision is taken by him and the petitioners to - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:6031 WP No. 145573 of 2020 withdraw the Writ Petition and if an order is passed, they shall not seek for recalling the same. 4. The oral submission made by counsel for the petitioners and the memo is placed on record. 5. The Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 42