IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY ,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF APRIL \\S TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE X o PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA^ WRIT PETITION NO: 10992 OF 2025 Between: P Sikamanehnamma, W/o.P.Krishna Reddy, Age about. 77years No. 14-84/5, M.B.Nagar, M.R.Palli,Tirupati Urban Mandal Tirupati, Tirupati District R/o.D. ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary (Revenue), Secretariat, Velagapudi, At Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. The District Collector, Tirupati. Tirupati District. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tirupati, Tirupati District. 4. The Tahsildar, Tirupathi urban Mandal Tirupati District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased ^ to issue an appropriate writ, order particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the action the circumstances stated or Direction, more of / the 3^'^ Respondent (RDO) in not proceeding with the Appeal vide vide Roc.G/885/2003 with respect to mutation of petitioner's name pertaining to her land an extent of Ac 0-80 cents situated in Sy.No. 4A/1B, Thimminaidu palem village, Tirupati District as illegal, arbitrary and offend Article 300A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 3'^'^ respondent (RDO) to expedite the Appeal vide Roc.G/885/2003,dt.24.7.2023 by fixing time. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3'"' respondent (RDO) to decide the Appeal vide Roc.G/885.2003, dt.24.7.2023 forthwith by giving opportunity to all the parties concerned pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: M/S M HEMALATHA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: APHC010218702025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] / TUESDAY ,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 10992/2025 Between: P Sikamanehnamma ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.M HEMALATHA Counsel for the Respondent{S): 1.GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 10992/2Q2fi ORDER: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of the India seeking the following reliefs:- “to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one Mandamus declaring the action of the 3' respondent (RDO) In not proceeding with the Appeal vide Roc.G/885/2003 dated 24.07.2023 with respect to mutation of petitioner’s name pertaining to her land admeasuring to an extent of Ac.0.80 cents situated in Sy.No.4A/1B, Thimminaidu palem Village, Tirupati District as illegal, arbitrary and offend Article 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 3''^ respondent (RDO) to expedite the Appeal vide Roc.G/885/2003 dated 24.07.2023 by fixing time and such other order. ” 2. Though the petitioners made several allegations against the respondents, during hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner requested this Court, to issue a direction to the respondents to dispose of the appeal dated 24.07.2023 preferred by the petitioner. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue refused and agreed to dispose of the appeal dated 24.07.2023 preferred by the petitioner, if any pending with the respondents. 4. In view of the submission of the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, this Court need not decide the truth otherwise of the allegations made in the petition. This Court is conscious that no such direction be issued, in view of the judgment pass not or of the Apex Court in “The Government of India wherein the Apex Court held that or easy disposal of cases i But, they do not serve to the for the petitioner himself requested the appeal dated 24.07.2023 except to issue such direction. 5. In the result, the Writ Petition is disposed of, directing the 3'= respondent to consider and dispose of the appeal dated 24.07.2023 preferred by the petitioner, after issuing notice and after providing opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel miscellaneous also stand closed. V. P.Venkatesh^’\ such orders may make for a quick in overburdened adjudicatory institutions. cause of justice. As the learned counsel to issue a direction to dispose of this Court find no other alternative application, pending, if any, shall T 2019(8) SCALE 544 SD/- G HELA NAIDU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTIOWfelCER //TRUE.COPY// To, 1- The Principal Secretary, State of Andhra Pradesh Secretariat, Velagapudi, At Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. The District Collector, Tirupati. Tirupati District. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, 4. The Tahsildar, Tirupathi urban Mandal 5. One CC to M/S. M HEMALATHA, 6. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, 7. Three CD Copies (Revenue), Tirupati, Tirupati District. Tirupati District. Advocate [OPUCJ High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] sree aa»' HIGH COURT DATED:29/04/2025 ORDER WP.No.10992 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS