SHRI. KYSAR PASHA ALIAS AZAR PASHA S/O APASARAPASHA v. SHRI AMEENSAB MASHEKASAB TAKKALAKI ALIAS AMEENSAB S/O MASHEKASAB TAKKALAKI
CRL.RP/100126/2023 · 2025-04-03
V Srishananda
Criminal Appealbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4448 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4448 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:5988 CRL.RP No. 100126 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF APRIL, 2025
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.100126 OF 2023 (397(Cr.PC)/438(BNSS))
BETWEEN:
SHRI KYSARPASHA @ AZAR PASHA S/O. APASARAPASHA, AGE: 43 YEARS, OCC. MEAT BUSINESS, R/O. NO. 2ND CROSS, 1ST FLOOR, R.K.PALACE, BANGALURU, PIN CODE-590006. …PETITIONER (BY SRI GIRIJA S. HIREMATH, ADVOCATE)
AND:
SHRI AMEENSAB MASHEKASAB TAKKALAKI @ AMEENSAB S/O. MASHEKASAB TAKKALAKI, AGE: 41 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. BILKERI VILLAGE, BAGALKOTE, TQ. AND DIST. BAGALKOTE, PIN CODE-587207. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI PRANAV BADAGI, ADVOCATE FOR SRI S.B. HEBBALLI, ADVOCATE)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/SEC. 397 R/W. 401 OF CR.P.C. SEEKING TO CALL FOR RECORDS AND ALLOW THE REVISION PETITION, TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGEMENT PASSED IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 106/2019 DATED ON 08.08.2022 PASSED BY THE LEANED II ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BAGALKOTE AND ALSO THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER PASSED IN C.C.
NO. 192/2017 DATED 17.10.2019 PASSED BY THE LEARNED ADDL.
CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C. BAGALKOTE, FOR OFFENCE P/U/SEC. 138 OF N.I. ACT AND ALLOW THE REVISION PETITION.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
MALLIKARJUN RUDRAYYA KALMATH Digitally signed by MALLIKARJUN RUDRAYYA KALMATH Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench Date: 2025.04.09 15:58:02 +0530
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:5988 CRL.RP No. 100126 of 2023
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA)
1. Smt.Girija S. Hiremath, learned counsel for the revision petitioner would submit that the accused has undergone the default sentence having been unable to comply the interim order of this Court.
2.
Learned counsel for the respondent submits mere undergoing the imprisonment would not ipso-facto, efface the order of conviction and he may be permitted to take recourse to the law under Section 421 of the Criminal Procedure Code, (for short, ‘the Cr.P.C.’).
3. Placing the submission of Smt.Girija Hiremath, and Sri.Pranav Badagi on behalf of Sri.S.B.Hebballi, revision petition is disposed of reserving liberty for complainant to exhaust the remedy available to the complainant under Section 421 of the Cr.P.C.
Sd/- (V.SRISHANANDA) JUDGE AC CT:PA/List No.: 2 Sl No.: 14