Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4448 (AP)

Bonda Surya Kumari, v. Bonda Sreenivasa Rao,

CRLRC/636/2008 · 2025-03-25

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010032652008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 636/2008 Between: Bonda Surya Kumari, ...PETITIONER AND Bonda Sreenivasa Rao and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. T M K CHAITANYA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: 2 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 636 of 2008 ORDER: 1. The Secretary, D.L.S.A., Visakhapatnam on 24.03.2025 submitted a comprehensive report along with necessary documents, submitting that the learned Judge, Family Court, Visakhapatnam furnished information through letter dated 22.03.2025 vide Dis.No.133, dated 22.03.2025 that O.P.No.634 of 2008 was filed in between the respondent No.1-Bonda Sreenivasa Rao and the petitioner-Bonda Surya Kumari, on the file of learned Judge, Additional Family Court, Visakhapatnam and the case was disposed on 22.10.2010 as, ‘‘No representation. Petitioner had died, and the petition was dismissed as infructuous’’. 2. Further, the Secretary, D.L.S.A., Visakhapatnam, directed the S.H.O, II Town Police Station, to serve notice on the petitioner-Bonda Surya Kumari. Accordingly, notices were served and the petitioner was present before the Secretary, D.L.S.A., Visakhapatnam on 21.03.2025 and submitted a representation that the respondent No.1-Bonda Sreenivasa Rao in this Criminal Revision Case, died on 24.09.2010 and she has no interest in pursuing the legal proceedings against the deceased/respondent No.1. 3 3. The report is accompanied with the letter of the petitioner-defacto complainant. 4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned assistant public prosecutor. 5. It is reported that respondent No.2-Bonda Rama Lakshmi, died long ago. 6. In view of the demise of the respondent No.1, the Criminal Revision Case is liable to be dismissed as abated. 7. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as abated. No order as to costs. Consequently, miscellaneous applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. ______________________________ DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO Date: 25.03.2025 PKR 4 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO 190 CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 636/2008 Date: 25.03.2025 PKR