Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 44479 (KAR)

SRI CHANNAPPAGOUDA S/OMALLANAGOUDA RONAD v. SRI VEERANAGOUDA S/O BASANAGOUDA PATIL

RSA/101058/2023 · 2025-02-17

E S Indiresh

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH, DHARWAD DATED THIS 17TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH RSA NO 101058 OF 2023 (SP) BETWEEN 1 . SRI CHANNAPPAGOUDA S/OMALLANAGOUDA RONAD AGE. 59 YEARS OCC. AGRICULTURIST, R/O. 112, GAVARAWAD TQ.DIST. GADAG ... APPELLANT (By SRI. : M/S GOULAY ASSOCIATES) AND 1 . SRI VEERANAGOUDA S/O BASANAGOUDA PATIL AGE. 44 YEARS OCC. AGRICULTURIST, R/O. 112, GAVARAWAD TQ.DIST. GADAG ... RESPONDENT RSA FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 03.08.2023 PASSED IN R.A.NO.99/2021 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, GADAG, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE 2 DATED 01.09.2021, PASSED IN O.S. NO.166/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE IV ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS-II, GADAG, DECREEING THE SUIT FILED FOR SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE OF CONTRACT. This appeal coming on for orders this day, the Court made the following; O R D E R Finally, three weeks’ time is granted to comply with the office objections, failing which, the appeal shall be dismissed without reference to the Bench for non-prosecution. SD/- JUDGE Note:- As per endorsement made in the order sheet dated 22/03/2025, the Advocate for the appellant has not complied with the office objections. Hence, this appeal is dismissed without reference to the Bench for non- prosecution as per court order dated 17.02.2025. BY ORDER OF THE COURT Sd/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR. C- By:-pla T- By: -ran