Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 44479 (ALL)

PRAKASH CHANDRA VERMA v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

CRLR/2262/2014 · 2025-04-20

Samit Gopal

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:59176 Court No. - 64 Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 2262 of 2014 Revisionist :- Prakash Chandra Verma Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Arvind Kumar Srivastava,P.C. Srivastava,Vijay Singh Sengar Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J. 1. List revised. 2. Sri Ajay Singh Sengar, Advocate holding brief of Sri Vijay Singh Sengar, learned counsel for the revisionist and Sri Ajay Singh, learned AGA-I for the State are present and have been heard. 3. This criminal revision is preferred against the judgment and order dated 01.08.2014 passed by Special Judge (Essential Commodities Act), Jalaun at Urai in Criminal Appeal No.31/2010 (Prakash Chandra Verma Vs. State of U.P.) and the judgment and order dated 25.05.2010 passed by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Urai in Case No.2374/1994, 2158/1994, 2375/1994, convicting the revisionist under Section 7/16 and under Rule 42(zzz) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act for one year rigorous imprisonment with fine of Rs.3,500/- and in default of payment of fine four months more rigorous imprisonment. 4. Trial court record has been received. 5. Learned counsel for the revisionist submits that the revisionist Prakash Chandra Verma has served out the entire sentence and has deposited the fine as awarded to him and has been released from jail. A report of Jail Superintendent, District Jail, Urai is on record, which has been placed by the office through its report dated 21.11.2023 and 15.12.2023. A perusal of which goes to show that the revisionist had been in jail from 01.08.2014 to 01.06.2015. It is further report that he has deposited the amount of fine as imposed upon him and has been released from jail after serving out entire sentence on 01.06.2015. 6. Since learned counsel for the revisionist submits that the present revision be dismissed as not pressed as such the same is dismissed as not pressed. 7. Office to communicate this order to the trial court concerned and also transmit the trial court record forthwith. (Samit Gopal,J.) Order Date :- 21.4.2025 Manoj Digitally signed by :- MANOJ KUMAR YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad