- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:6051 WP No. 100099 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 100099 OF 2025 (CS-RES) BETWEEN: SRI. PARASHARAM S/O YESHVANT PATIL, AGE: 58 YEARS, OCC: GOVT. SERVANT, R/O: LOKOLI, TQ: KHANAPUR, DIST: BELAGAVI-591 302. … PETITIONER (BY SRI. P.G. CHIKKANARAGUND, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE KHANAPUR CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., NO.387, VITHALDEV GALLI, KHANAPUR, TQ: KHANAPUR, DIST: BELAGAVI-591 302, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN. 2. THE KHANAPUR CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., NO.387, VITHALDEV GALLI, KHANAPUR, TQ: KHANAPUR, DIST: BELAGAVI-591 302, REP. BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER. … RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. GEETHA K.M. @ PAWAR, ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:6051 WP No. 100099 of 2025 ORAL ORDER Sri.P.G.Chikkanaragund., counsel for the petitioner has appeared in person. Sri.Geetha.K.M., counsel for respondents 1 and 2 has appeared through video conferencing. 2. The captioned Writ Petition is filed seeking a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to consider the representation dated:05.12.2024 vide Annexure-A. 3. Counsel for the respective parties urged several contentions. Heard the arguments and perused the writ papers with care. 4. Counsel for the petitioner submits that a mandamus may be ordered directing the respondents to consider the representation dated:05.12.2024 submitted by the petitioner vide Annexure-A. Counsel for the respondents submits that an appropriate order may be passed. 5. A Mandamus is ordered directing the respondents to consider the representation dated:05.12.2024 submitted by the - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:6051 WP No. 100099 of 2025 petitioner vide Annexure-A in accordance with the law, within six weeks from the receipt of certified copy of this order, if not already considered. 6. Resultantly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. This Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 51