IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WEDNESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA AND HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO FAMILY COURT APPEAL IFCA) NOS: 86 AND 89 OF 2025 FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO: 86 OF 2025: APHC010863732015 Appeal under Section 19 of the Family Court Act, against the Common Order and Decree, dated 25-03-20215 passed in FCOP No.232 of 2011 on the file of the Judge, Family Court-cum-V Additional District and Sessions Judge, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District. Between: Andhavarapu Ratna Kumari, W/o.Nagabhushanrao, aged 42 Occ: Nill, R/o.D.No.26-51-5 (Old Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam. years, D.No.7-73), Chinagantyada, ...Appellant/Respondent AND Andhavarapu Nagabhushanrao, S/o.Gonvindarajulu, aged 49 Occ; Employee, C/o.Boyna Nanarao, Kotabommali Village, Main Road Besides Mutyalamma Garments, Srikakulam District. years. ...Respondent/Petitioner lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition filed under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated intthe affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pidased to suspend the Decree and Order dated 25.03.2015 passed in FCOP.No.232 of 2011 on the file of the Judge, Family Court-cum-V Additional District and Sessions Judge, Visakhapatnam. Counsel for Appellant Counsel for Respondent : Sri V.V.Satish : Sri Nooka Jagannadham FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO: 89 OF 2025: APHC010846282015 Appeal under Section 19 of the Family Court Act, against the Common Order and Decree, dated 25-03-20215 passed in FCOP No.1264 of 2011 on the file of the Judge, Family Court-cum-V Additional District and Sessions Judge, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District. Between: Andhavarapu Ratna Kumari, W/o.Nagabhushanrao, aged 42 Occ: Mill, R/o.D.No.26-51-5 (Old Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam. years, D.No.7-73), Chinagantyada, ...Appellant/Petitioner AND Andhavarapu Nagabhushanrao, S/o.Gonvindarajulu, aged 49 Occ; Employee, C/o.Boyna Nanarao, Kotabommali Village, Main Road Besides Mutyalamma Garments, Srikakulam District. years. ...Respondent/Respondent Counsel for Appellant Counsel for Respondent The Court made the following: : Sri V.V.Satish : Sri Nooka Jagannadham / 1 APHC010526832023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3526] WEDNESDAY,THE NINETH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO FAMILY COURT APPEAL Nos: 86 and 89 of 2025 Between: 1. Andhavarapu Ratna Kumari, W/o.Nagabhushanrao, Aged 42 years, R/o.D.No.26-51-5 (old D.No.7-73), Chinagantyada, Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam. ...APPELLANT AND 1. Andhavarapu Nagabhushanrao, S/o.Govindarajulu, Aged 49 years, C/o.Boyna Nanarao, Kotabommali Village, Main Road, Besides Mutyalamma Garments, Srikakulam District. ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant: I.Mr.V.V.Satish Counsel for the Respondent: 1 .Mr.Nooka Jagannadham I 2 The Court made the following Common Judgment: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice N.Jayasurya, J) The present appeals have been preferred by the appellant -wife against the orders granting dissolution of the marriage vide Common Order dated 25.03.2015 in FCOP No.232 of 2011 and rejecting the application for conjugal on the file of the Family Court-cum-V rights vide FCOP No.1264 of 2011 Additional District and Sessions Judge, Visakhapatnam. At the time of considering these matters, both the appellant-wife and respondent-husband appeared before this Court, they are identified by their respective counsel. Both the parties filed a Joint Memo of Compromise, wherein, inter alia, they stated that they have been living together for the last three (03) years, under one roof, by resuming their marital life. On this Court, they also affirmed the said position. In view of the said Joint Memo and the statement made by them, the Order granting decree for divorce dated 25.03.2015 is set aside and the FCA (SR) No.34949 of 2015 and FCA (SR) No.34953 of 2015 are disposed of. No costs. a query by This Court also place on record the efforts made by the learned counsel on both sides for resolving the issue between the parties amicably. The Joint Memo of Compromise shall form part of this order. Consequently, the miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall also stand dismissed. Sd/- E KAMESWARA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR 1 //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Judge, Family Court-cum-V Additional District and Sessions Judge Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District. (With records if any) 'S' 2. One CC to Sri V.V.Satish, Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to Sri Nooka Jagannadham, Advocate [OPUC] 4. The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. 5. Two CD Copies BSV sree *Along with the Joint Memo of Compromise. 'I-' HIGH COURT DATED:09/07/2025 'S' COMMON JUDGMENT AND DECREE FCA NOS. 86 AND 89 OF 2025 X ^I|•0€T^Q25 5 ^ ^ Currmt s«iion DISPOSING OF THE FCAs AS PER JOINT MEMO OF COMPROMISE APHC010863732015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WEDNESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA AND HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO: 86 OF 2025 Between: Andhavarapu Ratna Kumari, W/o.Nagabhushanrao, aged 42 Occ; years, D.No.7-73), Chinagantyada, R/o.D.No.26-51-5 (Old Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam. ...Appellant/Respondent AND Andhavarapu Nagabhushanrao, S/o.Gonvindarajulu, aged 49 Occ: Employee, C/o.Boyna Nanarao, Kotabommali Village, Main Road Besides Mutyalamma Garments, Srikakulam District. years. ...Respondent/Petitioner Appeal under Section 19 of the Family Court Act, against the Common Order and Decree, dated 25-03-20215 passed in FCOP No.232 of 2011 on the file of the Judge, Family Court-cum-V Additional District and Sessions Judge, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District. «. - The appeal suit coming this day for order as to settlement in the presence of Sri V.V.Satish, Advocate for Appellant and of Sri Nooka Jagannadham, Advocate for Respondent, the Appellant and the Respondent having filed Memo requesting the Court to pass decree in terms of Joint Memo of Compromise entered into between them and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, Common Order and Decree of the Trial Court and the Joint Memo of Compromise purporting to have been signed by the parties and are appearing from the said Joint Memo of Compromise that the parties herein have entered into compromise and settled the matter in terms of compromise. This Court DOTH RECORD the terms of the said Joint Memo of Compromise the original whereof is filed in the record of the said F.C.A.No.86 of 2025 and a copy whereof is annexed hereto and Doth in terms of the said Joint Memo of Compromise, order and decree as follows: I.That the Family Court Appeal be and the same hereby is disposed of in terms of Joint Memo of Compromise. 2.That the Order granting Decree of divorce dated 25-03-2015 be and the same hereby is set aside. 3.That the terms of the Joint Memo of Compromise herein a. That the during pendency of the above appeals, both the parties herein have voluntarily settled their misunderstandings and agreed to live together by resuming their marital tie. Accordingly, both the parties have been started living together for the last three years under one roof, b. That both the parties are leading their lives harmoniously with each other, the respondent doesn’t want to press the decree of divorce and he has no objection for setting aside decree of divorce passed in FCOP No.232 of 2011, dated 25-03-2015 on the file of the Judge, Family Court-cum-V Additional District & Sessions Judge, Visakhapatnam. are: r :> \ 4. That there be no order as to costs in this Appeal. Sd/- E KAMESWARA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Judge, Family Court-cum-V Additional District and Sessions Judge, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District. 2. Two CD Copies BSV sree i- |[ ii I I I I i ♦l HIGH COURT DATED:09/07/2025 DECREE FCA NO. 86 OF 2025 Al S flVOCTaK 9.^ . Current Section . ^ DISPOSING OF THE FCA AS PER JOINT MEMO OF COMPROMISE APHC010846282015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WEDNESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA AND HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO FAMILY COURT APPEAL IFCA) NO: 89 OF Between.- Andhavarapu Ratna Kumari, W/o.Nagabhushanrao, Occ: Nill, aged 42 years D.No.7-73), Chinagantyada, R/o.D.No.26-51-5 (Old Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam. ...Appellant/Petitioner AND Andhavarapu Nagabhushanrao, S/o.Gonvindarajulu Occ: Employee, C/o. Boyna Nanarao, Kotabommali Village, Main Road Besides Mutyalamma Garments, Srikakulam District. aged 49 years ...Respondent/Respondent Appeal under Section 19 of the Family Court Act, against the Common Order and Decree, dated 25-03-20215 passed in FCOP No.1264 of 2011 the file of the Judge, Family Court-cum-V Additional District and Sessions Judge, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District. on The appeal suit coming this day for order as to settlement in the presence of Sri V.V.Satish, Advocate for Appellant and of Sri Nooka Jagannadham, Advocate for Respondent, the Appellant and the Respondent having filed Memo requesting the Court to pass decree in terms of Joint Memo of Compromise entered into between them and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, Common Order and Decree of the Trial Court and the Joint Memo of Compromise purporting to have been signed by the parties and are appearing from the said Joint Memo of Compromise that the parties herein have entered into compromise and settled the matter in terms of compromise. This Court DOTH RECORD the terms of the said Joint Memo of Compromise the original whereof is filed in the record of the said F.C.A.No.89 of 2025 and a copy whereof is annexed hereto and Doth in terms of the said Joint Memo of Compromise, order and decree as follows: I.That the Family Court Appeal be and the same hereby is disposed of in terms of Joint Memo of Compromise. 2.That the Order granting Decree of divorce dated 25-03-2015 be and the same hereby is set aside. 3.That the terms of the Joint Memo of Compromise herein are; c. That the during pendency of the above appeals, both the parties herein have voluntarily settled their misunderstandings and agreed to live together by resuming their marital tie. Accordingly, both the parties have been started living together for the last three years under one roof, d. That both the parties leading their lives harmoniously with each other, the respondent doesn’t want to press the decree of divorce and are he has no objection for setting aside decree of divorce passed in FCOP No.232 of 2011, dated 25-03-2015 on the file of the Judge, Family Court-cum-V Additional District & Sessions Judge, Visakhapatnam. 4. That there be no order as to costs in this Appeal. Sd/- E KAMESWARA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Judge, Family Court-cum-V Additional District and Sessions Judge Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District. 2. Two CD Copies BSV sree 4 '■%> . >♦' ,5 ^ HIGH COURT DATED.09/07/2025 DECREE FCA no. 89 OF 2025 disposing of the FCA AS PER JOINT MEMO OF COMPROMISE