Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 44475 (PNJ)

M/S MEGH RAJ BANSAL v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

ARB/248/2025 · 2025-08-06

Jagmohan Bansal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

` ARB-248-2025 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 255 ARB-248-2025 Date of Decision: 06.08.2025 M/s Megh Raj Bansal …Applicant Versus State of Punjab and others …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present: - Mr. Abhishek Sharma, Advocate and Mr. Amit Gupta, Advocate for the applicant Mr. Aman Dhir, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral) 1. Through instant application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short ‘1996 Act’), the applicant is seeking appointment of an Arbitrator. 2. The applicant was allotted work by the respondent vide letter dated 24.09.2009. A dispute erupted between the parties. There is an arbitration clause in Conditions of Contract. The applicant served notice upon the respondent seeking resolution of dispute through Arbitral Tribunal but to no avail. 3. Learned State counsel expressed his inability to controvert existence of arbitration clause and service of notice. 4. Conditions to invoke power conferred by Section 11(6) of 1996 Act stand satisfied, thus, I hereby appoint a Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the dispute between the parties. MOHIT KUMAR 2025.08.06 17:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. ` ARB-248-2025 -2- 5. Mr. Justice Ram Chand Gupta, Former Judge of this Court, residing at House No.215CP, Sector 4, M.D.C. Panchkula, Mobile No.9780008147 is hereby appointed as a Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the dispute between the parties, subject to compliance of statutory requirements. The learned Arbitrator is requested to comply with mandate of Section 12 of 1996 Act before proceeding further. 6. The parties at the first instance will appear before the Arbitrator on 20.08.2025 at 10:00 AM and thereafter, as directed by learned Arbitrator. 7. The Arbitrator shall be paid fee in accordance with the Fourth Schedule of the 1996 Act, as amended. 8. The Arbitrator is requested to complete the proceedings as per time limit specified under Section 29-A of the 1996 Act. 9. Needless to mention, parties would be at liberty to raise all the claims/defences/counter claims/pleas before the Arbitrator. Any observation made hereinabove will not be binding on the learned Arbitrator. 10. A request letter along with copy of this order be sent to Mr. Justice Ram Chand Gupta. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 06.08.2025 Mohit Kumar Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No MOHIT KUMAR 2025.08.06 17:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.