MUSKAAN SHARMA v. CENTRAL BOARD OF SCHOOL EDUCATION AND OTHERS
CWP/10237/2025 · 2025-04-08
Harsimran Singh Sethi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44471 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44471 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CWP-10108-2025 & -1- CWP-10237-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 122+135 CWP-10108-2025 Date of Decision :08.04.2025 Surya Sharma
...Petitioner
Versus Central Board of Secondary Education & others ...Respondents CWP-10237-2025 Muskaan Sharma
...Petitioner
Versus Central Board of Secondary Education & others ...Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Present: Mr. Rohit Seth, Advocate for the petitioner(s) in both the petitions. Mr. Beant Singh Seemar, Advocate for respondents No.1 to 3. * * * Harsimran Singh Sethi, J. (Oral)
1. In the present set of two petitions, the prayer of the petitioner(s) is for the correction of name of the father of the petitioner(s), which has wrongly been mentioned as ‘Rajiv Kumar Sharma’ instead of ‘Rajeev Kumar Sharma’ in the detailed marks certificate (DMC) of X and XII examinations, which is not being corrected by the respondents and the same AARTI SHARMA 2025.04.09 10:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CWP-10108-2025 & -2- CWP-10237-2025 is causing prejudice to the petitioner(s).
2. Notice of motion.
3. Mr. Beant Singh Seemar, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3 and submits that the request of the petitioner(s) for correction in the name of the father of the petitioner(s) is already pending
consideration and it is likely that the claim of the petitioner(s) will be accepted and appropriate order on the same will be passed within a period of 02 weeks from today.
4.
Learned counsel for the petitioner(s) submits that keeping in view the statement made by learned counsel for respondent No.1 to 3, no further grievance of the petitioner(s) survives in the present petitions and the same may kindly be disposed of having been not pressed any further.
5. Ordered accordingly.
6. A photocopy of this order be placed on the file of connected cases. April 08, 2025 (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) aarti JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No AARTI SHARMA 2025.04.09 10:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document