[2025:RJ-JP:45182] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Revision Petition No. 30/2023 1. Kishanlal S/o Shri Sheonarayan, Aged About 60 Years, R/o Hasanpur, Tehsil Tapukara, District Alwar And Second Address- Nasopur, Tehsil Kotkasim, District Alwar(Rajasthan). 2. Satyapal S/o Shri Mangalram, Aged About 59 Years, R/o Hasanpur, Tehsil Tapukara, District Alwar. ----Petitioners Versus Rohitash S/o Shri Prabhu Dayal, Aged About 60 Years, R/o Hasanpur, Tehsil Tapukara, District Alwar (Rajasthan). ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shashwat Purohit, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vineet Dixit, Adv. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order 11/11/2025 1- izfroknh&;kph dh vksj ls ;g fuxjkuh ;kfpdk varxZr /kkjk 115 lh-ih-lh- ds rgr fo}ku flfoy U;k;k/kh'k ,oa U;kf;d eftLVªsV] frtkjk] vyoj }kjk nhokuh okn la[;k&122@2022 esa ikfjr vkns'k fnukad 10-11-2022 ls O;fFkr gksdj izLrqr dh] ftlds ek/;e ls izfroknh&;kph dk vkosnu varxZr vkns'k 7 fu;e 11 lh-ih-lh- [kkfjt fd;k x;kA 2- fo}ku vf/koDRkk izfroknh&;kph dk fuosnu gS fd oknh }kjk ftl Hkwfe ds laca/k esa LFkk;h fu"ks/kkKk pkgh gS] og okn esa of.kZr vfHkdFkuksa rFkk okn ds layXu nLrkostksa ds vk/kkj ij gh d`f"k Hkwfe gS] vr% ,slh fLFkfr esa izdj.k dh lquokbZ dk {ks=kf/kdkj jktLo U;k;ky; dks gS] flfoy U;k;ky; [2025:RJ-JP:45182] (2 of 5) [CR-30/2023] dks {ks=kf/kdkj /kkjk 207 jktLFkku dk'rdkjh vf/kfu;e ds izko/kkuksa ds vuqlkj oftZr gS] ysfdu blds ckotwn fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk rF;ksa o fof/k ds foijhr tkdj vk{ksfir vkns'k ikfjr fd;k x;k gS] tks vikLr gksus ;ksX; gSA 3- blds foijhr fo}ku vf/koDrk oknh&v;kph dk fuosnu gS fd oknxzLr Hkwfe [kljk uacj 157 dh gS] ftlds vklikl vkcknh cl pqdh gS rFkk orZeku le; esa ;g Hkwfe vkoklh; iz;kstu ds dke esa vk jgh gS] bl izdkj ;g vkoklh; Hkwfe gS] var esa fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds vk{ksfir vkns'k dks fof/klEer gksuk crkrs gq, ;g fuxjkuh ;kfpdk [kkfjt fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA 4- ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk Eldeco Housing and Indurstries Ltd. Vs. Ashok Vidyarthi and Ors. 2023 INSC 1043 ,oa Soumitra Kumar Sen Vs. Shyamlal Kumar Sen & Ors. 2018 DNJ (SC) 769 esa ;g vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k gS fd vkns'k 7 fu;e 11 lh-ih-lh- ds vkosnu ij fopkj djrs le; ek= oknh ds vfHkdFkuksa o okni= ds lkFk izLrqr nLrkostksa ij gh fopkj fd;k tk ldrk gSA 5- U;kf;d fu.kZ; Lal Singh Jhala Vs. Panna Lal 2016(0) Supreme (Raj.) 905 ds ekeys esa jktLFkku Hkw&jktLo vf/kfu;e] 1956 ¼ftls vkxs ^^vf/kfu;e&1956^^ dgk tkosxk½ dh /kkjk 103] jktLFkku dk'rdkjh vf/kfu;e&1955 dh /kkjk 5¼24½ rFkk vU; lqlaxr izko/kkuksa ij fopkj djus ds mijkUr fuEukuqlkj O;oLFkk izfrikfnr dh x;h gS& "A bare look at the above two definitions, which have been indicated in two provisions relating to the Acts which deals with the land and abadi land, clearly reveals that till such time that the 'land' is not converted into 'abadi land', the same continuous to be land i.e. agriculture land with consequences as provided under both the Acts. [2025:RJ-JP:45182] (3 of 5) [CR-30/2023] ...................it is well settled that pertaining to an unconverted agriculture land, the suit would lie before the Revenue Court only and the Civil Court's jurisdiction would be barred under the provisions of section 207 of the Tenancy Act." 6- bl U;k;ky; }kjk Rama Kant Khetan Vs. Sri Ram Het Gupta & Ors. 1985 RLR 281 ds ekeys esa ;g vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k x;k gS fd tc rd d`f"k Hkwfe dk Hkw&mi;ksx ifjorZu ugha gksrk gS rc rd mldh izd`fr d`f"k Hkwfe gh jgsxhA 7- blh izdkj bl U;k;ky; ds fu.kZ; Premi Devi Vs. Deva Ram & Ors. 2009 (1) DNJ (Raj.) 410 esa Hkh leku izd`fr dk fookn mRiUu gqvk Fkk rFkk U;k;ky; }kjk iSjk la[;k&3] 7 rFkk 8 esa tks vfHker izdV fd;k x;k] og lqlaxr gS tks fuEukuqlkj gS& "3. According to learned counsel for the appellant though the land is recorded as agricultural but it is surrounded by the Abadi land has come within the Municipal area of Jodhpur and further more is that the land in question was never cultivated, therefore, the civil Court has jurisdiction to entertain the suit relating to the land in question. 7. In view of the above reasons, the aforesaid judgments have no application to the facts of the case. The law in Rajasthan is very clear and it excludes the agricultural land from the jurisdiction of the civil Court and there are law by which the agricultural land can be converted into Abadi land and mere fact that the agricultural land holder himself put the land for non- agricultural purpose is not sufficient for conversion of land from agricultural land to Abadi land. In Rajasthan, as per law, no agricultural land holder (Khatedar Tenant) can convert the agricultural land to Abadi land without permission of State. The taxation law may have deeming clauses for taxing the transaction and valuing the property, but same cannot be accepted while determining the jurisdiction of the civil Court qua the jurisdiction of revenue Court. 8. Learned counsel for the appellant also submitted that the defendant never contended that the land was [2025:RJ-JP:45182] (4 of 5) [CR-30/2023] cultivated, therefore it is not agricultural land. The argument is of no consequence in view of the fact that the nature of land is not dependent upon the fact that whether it is cultivated or not. When it is admitted case that land was not converted to Abadi from agricultural land and it is recorded as agricultural land in the revenue record, there is no merit in this appeal." 8- blh izdkj blh U;k;ky; }kjk S. B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 3658/2018 Om Prakash Vs. Smt. Mishro & Ors. esa ikfjr fu.kZ; fnukad 14-08-2025 ds iSjk la[;k&19 esa fuEu O;oLFkk izfrikfnr dh xbZ gS%& ^^19- ;fn dksbZ [kkrsnkj viuh d`f"k Hkwfe dks vd`f"k iz;kstukFkZ mi;ksx djuk pkgrk gS rks vf/kfu;e&1956 dh /kkjk 90, ds rgr fofgr izfdz;k viuk;h tkdj rFkk uxj lq/kkj dj o izhfe;e vkfn vnk dj l{ke izkf/kdkjh@jkT; ljdkj ls Hkw&:ikUrj.k vkns'k izkIr fd;k tkuk vko';d gS rFkk ,sls vkns'kksa ds fcuk vd`f"k iz;kstukFkZ d`f"k Hkwfe dk mi;ksx fd;k tkrk gS rks /kkjk 91¼1½ Hkw&jktLo vf/kfu;e ds rgr mlds fo:) csn[kyh lfgr vU; fof/k&lEer dk;Zokgh dh tk ldrh gSA orZeku ekeys esa Hkh oknh dh vksj ls d`f"k Hkwfe dk :ikUrj.k@Hkw&mi;ksx ifjorZu ugha djk;k gS] mlds ckotwn mldk ;g vfHkdFku fd bl Hkwfe dks vd`f"k iz;kstukFkZ ekuk tkos] ;g fuosnu fof/kd izko/kkuksa ds mYya?ku esa gS rFkk bls flfoy U;k;ky; vFkok laoS/kkfud U;k;ky; }kjk ekU;rk ;k Lohd`fr ugha nh tk ldrhA** 9- Lo;a oknh dh vksj ls izLrqr iathd`r foØ; foys[k ds vuqlkj oknxzLr Hkwfe d`f"k Hkwfe jgh gS rFkk tekcanh esa Hkh ;g Hkwfe vkt Hkh d`f"k Hkwfe ds :i esa gh ntZ gS] vr% ,slh fLFkfr esa oknxzLr Hkwfe lHkh iz;kstuksa ds fy, d`f"k Hkwfe gh ekuh tk;sxh rFkk /kkjk 207 jktLFkku dk'rdkjh vf/kfu;e ds izko/kkuksa ds vuqlkj izdj.k dh lquokbZ dk {ks=kf/kdkj bl U;k;ky; dks ugha gSA [2025:RJ-JP:45182] (5 of 5) [CR-30/2023] 10- fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk tks vk{ksfir vkns'k fnukad 10-11-2022 dks ikfjr fd;k x;k gS] og iw.kZr% rF;ksa o fof/k ds foijhr gS] vr% mls vikLr djrs gq, rFkk ;kph&izfroknh dk vkosnu varxZr vkns'k 7 fu;e 11 lh-ih-lh- Lohdkj djrs gq, izR;FkhZ&oknh dk fopkj.k U;k;ky; esa yafcr okn la[;k&122@2022 ukeatwj fd;k tkrk gSA 11- blh vuqlkj izfroknh&;kph dh vksj ls izLrqr fuxjkuh ;kfpdk Lohdkj dj fuLrkfjr dh tkrh gS rFkk LFkxu vkosnu o vU; vkosnu] ;fn dksbZ yafcr gksa] rks os mDrkuqlkj fuLrkfjr fd;s tkrs gSaA (UMA SHANKER VYAS),J Murari Lal Sharma /14