Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:45302
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 127 of 2023 1 - Pooja Singh Rajput D/o Suryakant Singh Rajput Aged About 28 Years R/o Village Munund, Tahsil Chhal, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Social Welfare, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar,
Nawa
Raipur,
District
Raipur,
Chhattisgarh 2 - Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat Dharamjaigarh, District Raigarh,
Chhattisgarh 3 - Tahsildar Dharamjaigarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh 4 - Sub Divisional Officer Rural Engineering Service, Dharamjaigarh, District
Raigarh,
Chhattisgarh 5 - Technical Assistant Janpad Panchayat Dharamjaigarh, District Raigarh,
Chhattisgarh 6 - Sarpanch Gram Panchayat, Munund, Tahsil Chhal, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh
... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. S. P. Sahu, Advocate For State : Mr. Devesh G. Kela, Panel Lawyer and Mr. ABHIGYA SAXENA Digitally signed by ABHIGYA SAXENA
2 For Respondent : Ravi Bhagat, Advocate Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Order on Board (04.09.2025)
1. At the outset, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that this writ petition may be disposed of giving liberty to the petitioner to make a detailed representation before the respondents/competent authority raising all grounds as raised in this writ petition along with the copy of petition and in turn, respondents/competent authority may also be directed to consider and decide the same at the earliest within any specific period as fixed by this Court. He further prays that the representation may be decided taking into consideration the paragraph 4.2 of the reply filed by the respondent No.2.
2. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents submit that he is having no objection to the limited prayer made by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.
3. On the basis of submission made by both the counsel for the parties, at this stage, without entering into the merits of the case, this writ petition is disposed of giving liberty to the petitioner to file a detailed representation regarding grant of job and raising all grounds as raised in this writ petition along with the copy of this petition before the respondent/competent authority within ‘15 days’ from the date of receipt of copy of this order and on submission of such representation the respondent/competent authority is directed to
3 consider and decide the same within an outer limit of 45 days from the submission of such representation in accordance with the relevant rules, law, circulars and instructions applicable to the case of petitioner.
4. With the aforesaid observation, the present writ petition stands
disposed of. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Saxena