V.Prakasha Rao v. Transmission Corporation of Andhra Pradesh (A.P.Transco)
WP/38949/2018 · 2025-04-29
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44453 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44453 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
¥ ¥ y r IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL | TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE \\ PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 38949 OF 2018 Between: .V.Prakasha Rao, S/o. Late Sri Prasada Rao Aged 54 years Occ Divisional Engineer / M and P APEPDCL / Rajamahendravaram R/o Flat No.S-6, Krishna Mansion Near RTC Complex, Annamayya Street Rajamahendravaram. ...Petitioner AND
1. Transmission Corporation of Andhra Pradesh (A.P.Transco), Rep. by its Chairman and Managing Director Vidyut Soudha, Vijayawada Krishna District. 2. Eastern Power Distribution Company of A.P. Limited (APEPDCL), Rep. by its Chairman and Managing Director P and T Colony, Seethammadhara, Visakhapatnam. 3. The Additional Secretary A.P.Transco, Vidyut Soudha Vijayawada Krishna District
4. The Chairman and Managing Director (A.P.Transco), Vidyut Soudha, Vijayawada Krishna District
5. The Joint Managing Director Transmission Corporation of A.P. Limited, Vidyut Soudha, Vijayawada
6. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by the Secretary Department of Energy Secretariat Velagapudi Guntur, Andhra Pradesh ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order especially in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the inaction of the Respondent No.4 in failing to consider the Petitioners appeal Dt.26.03.2018 for rectifying the seniority of the Petitioner in the seniority list as arbitrary, contrary to law and violative of Articles 14 of the Constitution of India and consequently directing the Respondent No.4 to dispose of the Petitioners appeal Dt.26.03.2018 merits by following due process of law within a time frame fixed by this Honorable Court. on lA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to rectify the seniority list by ordering rank promotions to the Petitioner to the post of Superintending Engineer / General Manager in the Respondent No.2s corporation and pass lA NO: 2 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to extend the time stipulated in the order made in lA.No. 1/2018 in writ petition No. 38949/2018 dated 06.11.2018 till 28.02.2019.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. CH PUSHYAM KIRAN Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 5: SRI V V SATISH (SC FOR APTRANSCO) Counsel for the Respondent No. 6: GP FOR ENERGY The Court made the following order:
APHC010807752018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 38949/2018 Between:
1.V.PRAKASHA RAO. S/0. LATE SRI PRASADA RAO AGED 54 YEARS OCC . DIVISIONAL ENGINEER / M AND P APEPDCL / RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM R/0 FLAT NO.S-6, KRISHNA MANSION STREET NEAR RTC COMPLEX RAJAMAH END RAVARAM. ANNAMAYYA ...PETITIONER AND 1.TRANSMISSION CORPORATION OF ANDHRA PRADESH A P TRANSCO, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR VIDYUT SOUDHA, VIJAYAWADA KRISHNA DISTRICT. 2. EASTERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OF A P LIMITED APEPDCL, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR P AND T COLONY, SEETHAMMADHARA, VISAKHAPATNAM. 3.THE ADDITIONAL SECRETARY A P TRANSCO, VIDYUT SOUDHA VIJAYAWADA KRISHNA DISTRICT 4.THE CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR A P TRANSCO, VIDYUT SOUDHA, VIJAYAWADA KRISHNA DISTRICT 5.THE JOINT MANAGING DIRECTOR TRANSMISSION CORPORATION OF A P LIMITED, VIDYUT SOUDHA, VIJAYAWADA 6.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY SECRETARIAT VELAGAPUDI GUNTUR, ANDHRA PRADESH ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.CH PUSHYAM KIRAN Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1 .V V SATISH (SC for APEPDCL) 2.GP FOR ENERGY (AP) 3.ANUP KOUSHIK KARAVADI(SC FOR APTRANSCO)
The Court made the following:
ORDER: Despite the matter being listed under the caption “for dismissal none represented for the Petitioner.
2. The proceedings sheet, dated 23.04.2025 also shows that, none represented for the Petitioner. In that view, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution .
3. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. REnic-^" ‘ ~ Sd/. A. VIJAYA BABU assistant RE(^TRAR W SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To,
1. One CC to Sri. Ch Pushyam Kiran Advocate [OPUC]
2. One CC to Sri. V V Satish (SC for APTRANSCO) [OPUC]
3. Two CCs to GP for Energy, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT]
4. Three CD Copies GSC
HIGH COURT DATED:30/04/2025
ORDER WP.No.38949 of 2018 ^ro<= 2 li JUL 2025 Co DISMISSING THE WP FOR NON PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS