IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH;: (Special Original Jurisdiction) ::AMARAVATI FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT the honourable SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 1Q9fi.? DF Between: Road, Bhakarapeta.^Chinna'^TtSlu^^^^^^ Tirupathi ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh Revenue Department District. cjoor by its Principal Secretary Secretariat Buildings, Amararathi, Guntur 2. The Joint Collector, Tirupathi District 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer Tirupathi, Tirupathi District , 4. The Tahsildar, Chinnagottigallu Mandal r; y?r'^?ta Ramana. S/o D. Ramaiah R/ o Balija Street, Chinnagottigall at Tirupathi Tirupathi District ft/I Known, Occ Not Known Mandal, Tirupathi District ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith be pleased to issue Respondents herein the High Court may a WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the particularly Respondent No.4 iin threatening to dispossess the petitioner from the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property of an extent of Ac. 1.32 Cents, Bhakarapeta Village, Chinnagottigallu Chittoor District, on the situated at Sy.No.107 of Mandal, Tirupathi District, Erstwhile ascendancy of the Respondent No.5, without process of I ■ bearing or following the due process of law is questioned as the issuing any notice same is arbitrary, illegal, contrary to the well- established legal principles apart from being violative fundamental and constitutional rights guaranteed under articles 14, 19, 21 and 300- A of the Constitution of India and of consequently direct the Respondents, not to interfere with the petitioners peaceful possession and enjoyment of the subject property of an extent of Ac. 1.32 Cents, situated at Sy.No.107 of Bhakarapeta Village, Chinnagottigallu Mandal, Tirupathi District, Erstwhile Chittoor District lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances Stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to DIRECT the Respondents, not to interfere with the petitioners peaceful possession and enjoyment of the subject property of an extent of Ac. 1.32 Cents, situated at Sy.No.l07 of Bhakarapeta Village, Chinnagottigallu Mandal, Tirupathi District, Erstwhile Chittoor District, pending disposal of the WTft.petition before this Hon’ble court. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SURESH KUMAR REDDY KALAVA Counsel for the Respondents No.1 to 4: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.5: None The Court made the following; Order APHC010220252025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [0] FRIDAY JHE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT WRIT PETITION NO: 10953/2025 Between; • ...PETITIONER Dasari Krishnaiah AND ...RESPONDENT(S) The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.SURESH KUMAR REDDY KALAVA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following order: The petitioner claims that he is the absolute owner and possessor of land admeasuring an extent of Ac. 1.32 cents in Sy.No.107 of Bhakarapeta Village, Chinnagottigallu Mandal, Tirupati District. It is his further case that, initially the land admeasuring an extent of Ac.2.64 cents was assigned in favor of his grandfather Sri Dasari Chinnappa vide A.M.No.872/4/1336, dated 27.02.1926. After demise of his grandfather, the entire extent was inherited by the sons of original assignee, Sri D. Venkata Naru, Sri D. Ranagaiah and Sri D.Siddaiah. would further submit that one of the sons of the original assignee namely Sri D.Rangaiah died issueless and the other two have equally shared the above-mentioned land. The petitioner submits that, the property claimed by him fell to his father’s share and after demise of his father, he came into possession of the said property pursuant to an oral partition entered among his brothers and since then, he is in possession and enjoyment of the same. He sons 2. It is the further case of the petitioner that, the 5*^ respondent raised a dispute over the subject land against him I 3 and the same was eventually culminated in proceedings dated 08.12.2023, before the Joint Collector, Tirupati, whereunder the claim of the 5^^ respondent was rejected, and the said order attained finality. It is further case of the petitioner that, at the instance of the 5^*^ respondent, the 4*^ respondent is again interfering with the petitioner’s possession. Questioning the said action, the present writ petition is filed. 3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue placed on record the written instructions dated 25.04.2025, furnished by the 4''' respondent. On perusal of the same, the 4^^ respondent categorically asserted that, neither the 4*'' respondent nor the revenue field staff interfered with the petitioner’s possession the subject lands at any point of time and they have neither initiated any action nor issued any notice to the petitioner. The instructions dated 25.04.2024, are placed on record. over In view of the above submissions, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition by directing the respondents not to interfere with the petitioner’s possession the land admeasuring an extent of Ac. 1.32 cents in Sy.No.107 of 4. over Bhakarapeta Village, Chinnagottigallu Mandal, Timpati District, except in accordance with law. There shall be no order applications, if any, shall stand closed. as to costs. As a sequel, pending Sd/- A. VIJAYA BABU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// To, SECTION OFFICER 2. The Joint Collector, Tirupathi District at Tirupathi 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tirupathi 4^he Tahsildar, Chinnagottigallu Mandal, Tirupathi District (O.^ne CC to SRI SURESH KUMAR REDDY KALAVA, vyo CCS to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court of Andhra Tyihree CD Copies Revenue Tirupathi District Advocate [OPUC] j Pradesh [OUT] gsg HIGH COURT DATED: 25/04/2025 ORDER WP.No.10953of2025 DISPOSING THE WP WITHOUT COSTS