AP STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION & ANR v. SMT.PALLA RAMANI & 4 ORS
MACMA/1947/2017 · 2025-07-31
A Hari Haranadha Sarma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44447 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44447 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
MAIN CASE: M.A.C.M.A.No.1947 of 2017 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No. DATE
ORDER OFFICE NOTE
27. 10.10.2025 AHHS,J I.A.No.1 of 2025
This matter is listed under the caption “For Being Mentioned”.
Learned counsel for Respondent No.5 brought to the notice of this Court that in Para No.28 of the judgment, under the caption “Apportionment,” Respondent No.5 has been incorrectly mentioned as Respondent No.4. It is a clerical and inadvertent error.
Respondent No.4 is the driver of the offending vehicle, whereas Respondent No.5 is entitled to compensation. Therefore, the Apportionment shall be among the claimants 1 to 3 and respondent No.5 only.
In view of the above, Registry is directed to carry out the necessary amendments in Para No.28 of the judgment vide Column Nos.ii and iii, under the caption “Apportionment,” as “Respondent No.5”
2 in place of “Respondent No.4” and necessary consequential corrections shall also be carried out in the decree.
In view of the above, this application is allowed.
_______
AHHS, J BSK