SUNITA RUHELA W/O SHRI SUBHASH CHANDRA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/17369/2025 · 2025-11-14
Ashok Kumar Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44440 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44440 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:45932] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17369/2025 Sunita Ruhela W/o Shri Subhash Chandra, Aged About 47 Years, R/o Village Bairwas, Laxmangarh, Sikar, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur
2. The Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner.
3. The Principal, Shaheed Goverdhan Singh Dhaka Govt. Sr. Secondary School, Jasrasar, Sikar.
4. Vinod Kumar Jangir, Principal At Shaheed Goverdhan Singh Dhaka Govt. Sr. Secondary School, Jasrasar, Sikar ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sandeep Kalwaniya For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manoj Sharma, AAG with Mr. Vishal Kumar and Mr. Parth Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Order 14/11/2025
1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:-
“I). By an appropriate writ, order and direction, the impugned order dated 22.09.2025 and relieving order dated 25.09.2025 (Ann.1 and 2) may kindly be quashed and set aside. II). By an appropriate writ, order or direction the respondents be directed to continue the petitioner on the post of Principal in Shaheed Goverdhan Singh Dhaka Govt. Senior Secondary School, Jasrasar Dist. Sikar.”
[2025:RJ-JP:45932] (2 of 2) [CW-17369/2025]
2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents- Authority to consider and resolve his grievances.
3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after enquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioner but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the
order to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in her representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, she is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition.
4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of.
(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /376