Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 44440 (ALL)

JAY SINGH ALIAS DEEPAK SINGH v. STATE OF U.P.

NABAIL/3098/2025 · 2025-04-29

Vivek Varma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:67202 Court No. - 69 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 3098 of 2025 Applicant :- Jay Singh Alias Deepak Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Santosh Kumar Dubey,Vinay Bhushan Upadhyay Counsel for Opposite Party :- Ashutosh Kumar Singh,G.A.,Roopesh Srivastava Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, Sri V.P. Tripathi, learned A.G.A. for the State- opposite party, and Sri Rupesh Srivastava, learned counsel for the informant, and perused the material placed on record. 2. This application has been filed seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 14 of 2025, under Sections 109, 115(2), 351(2), 352 B.N.S., Police Station Dheena, District Chandauli. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the instant case. As per the allegations in the first information report, the applicant along with another accused was alleged to have assaulted the informant. As per the medical report as well as supplementary medical report, the injuries sustained by the injured were found simple in nature. The nature of the injuries shows that there was no intent to murder. Co- accused Ashok Singh was granted regular bail by the Sessions Judge, Chandauli vide order dated 27.03.2025 passed in Bail Application No. 337 of 2025. The applicant has no criminal antecedents. It is next submitted that the investigation is going on and the applicant has apprehension of his arrest in the above mentioned case. 4. Learned A.G.A. and learned counsel for the informant opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail but could not satisfactorily dispute the aforesaid submissions from the record. 5. Learned counsel for the applicant further submits that the application for grant of anticipatory bail be confined only till the submission of police report. 6. Having regard to the submissions made by learned counsel for the applicant, considering the nature of accusations and antecedents of the applicant and, in particular, the fact that as per the medical report as well as supplementary medical report, the injuries sustained by the injured were found simple in nature; and, co-accused Ashok Singh was granted regular bail by the Sessions Judge, Chandauli, without commenting on merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on anticipatory bail till the submission of police report. 7. 7. In the event of arrest, the applicant- Jay Singh be released on anticipatory bail in the aforesaid case crime till the submission of police report, if any, under Section 193 (3) B.N.S.S., on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Station House Officer of the police station concerned with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; (iii) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court and if he has passport, the same shall be deposited by him before the S.S.P./S.P. concerned. 8. In default of any of the conditions, the Investigating Officer is at liberty to file appropriate application for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the applicant. 9. The Investigating Officer is directed to conclude the investigation of the present case in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of a copy of this order independently without being prejudiced by any observation made by this Court while considering and deciding the present anticipatory bail application of the applicant. 10. The applicant is directed to produce a copy of this order before the S.S.P./S.P. concerned within ten days from today, who shall ensure the compliance of present order. 11. The application stands disposed of. Order Date :- 30.4.2025 SKT/- Digitally signed by :- SHIVA KANT TIWARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad