1 2025:CGHC:49067 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 11387 of 2025 1. Bisahu Das Panika S/o Manrakhan Das Manikpuri, Aged About 68 Years Retired Labour, R/o Ward No. 09, Bajrang Chowk, Ambagarh Chowki, District Mohla-Manpur-Ambagarh Chowk (C.G.) 2. Chaitram Nishad S/o Bisnath Nishad Aged About 74 Years Retired Chowkidar, R/o Ward No. 03, Village Pangari, District Mohla-Manpur- Ambagarh Chowk (C.G.) 3. Sujaan Singh Yadav S/o Ram Prasadi, Aged About 71 Years Retired Labour, R/o Village And Post Mohla, District Mohla-Manpur-Ambagarh Chowk (C.G.) 4. Pyare Lal S/o Dashrath Kunjam Aged About 72 Years Retired Labour, R/o Village Dhobedand, Post Kande, Tehsil And District Mohla-Manpur- Ambagarh Chowk (C.G.) 5. Khem Lal Sahu S/o Ghasi Ram Sahu, Aged About 72 Years Retired Labour, R/o Village And Post Rengakathera, Tehsil And District Mohla-Manpur- Ambagarh Chowk (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Public Work Department Mahanadi Bhawan Atal Nagar Raipur (C.G.) 2. Engineer In Chief, Public Work Department North Block, Sector 19, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 3. Chief Engineer, Public Work Department Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 4. Superintendent Engineer Public Work Department Division Durg, District Durg (C.G.) 5. Executive Engineer, Public Work Department Bha/road Division Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) 2 6. Senior District Treasury Officer, Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) 7. Sub Divisional Officer, Public Work Department (Bha/road) Sub Division Chowki, District Mohla-Manpur-Ambagarh Chowk (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr . Swapnil Keshri, Advocate. For Respondent(s) /State. : Mr. Santosh Bharat, Panel Lawyer (Hon’ble Mr. Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas) Order on Board 24/09/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the issue involved in this writ petition has already been decided by this Court in case of Faguvaram Patel & others Vs. State of Chhattisgarh [WPS No. 3870 of 2021 (decided on 30.09.2022)], therefore, the present writ petition may be disposed of in the same terms. 2. In view of the above, the instant writ petition also deserves to be disposed of in terms of the judgment passed by this Court in case of Faguvaram Patel (supra). 3. Accordingly, the writ petition (s) stands disposed of. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) JUDGE Raju RAVVA SATYANARAYANA RAJU Digitally signed by RAVVA SATYANARAYANA RAJU Date: 2025.09.25 11:53:04 +0530