Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 44420 (AP)

Kanderi Padma v. The State of Andhra Pradesh.

WP/22492/2020 · 2025-03-27

T C D Sekhar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010339572020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3505] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 22492/2020 Between: Kanderi Padma and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. K.S.G. PADMAVATHI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 2 The Court made the following order: The petitioners claim that they are the absolute owners and possessors of the residential houses bearing Nos.3-42, 3-41 & 13- 66, admeasuring an extent of Ac.2.00 cents each in R.S.No.381/5 of Tummalapalli Village, Allavaram Mandal, East Godavari District. It is the case of the petitioners that the respondents are trying to interfere with their possession on the ground that the land in which houses of the petitioners are existing, is required for constructions of Government Buildings i.e., Grama Sachivalayam and Rythubharosa Kendram etc. It is their further case that they are in possession and enjoyment of the subject lands from the past three generation, and in view of the same, they raised thatched houses. As the respondents tried to evict the petitioners from the subject land, without issuing any notice and without following due process of law, they approached this Court by filing the present writ petition. 2. While ordering notice, this Court by order dated 30.11.2023, directed the respondents not to dispossess the petitioners from the subject land without following due process of law. 3. When the matter is taken up for hearing today, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue placed the written 3 instructions dated 27.03.2025, furnished by the 5th respondent- Tahsildar. 4. On perusal of the said instructions, it is clear that, though initially, the subject lands are proposed for construction of Village Secretariat and Rythu bharosa Kendram, the said proposal was dropped, as the respondents identified alternative land in Sy.No.1282 of the said village. The said instructions are placed on record. 5. In view of the same, the present Writ Petition is disposed of, as no further orders are necessary in terms of interim order dated 30.11.2020. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. _______________ T.C.D.SEKHAR,J Date: 28.03.2025 ANS 4 362 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 22492/2020 Date: 28.03.2025 ANS