- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5024 WP No. 104643 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 104643 OF 2023 (S-RES) BETWEEN: FAKIRAGOWDA HALAPPAGOWDA PATIL S/O HALAPPAGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, C/O. MALATESH MEDICALS, R/A: KAGINELLI CROSS, P.B. ROAD, HAVERI-591 307. … PETITIONER (BY SRI. BASAVARAJ S.SATANNAVAR, ADVOCATE-ABSENT) AND: 1. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDING, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560 001. 2. DIRECTOR, PRE-UNIVERSITY EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, STATE OF KARNATAKA, MALLESWARAM, BENGALURU-560 003. 3. DEPUTY DIRECTOR, PRE-UNIVERSITY EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, HAVERI-591 307. 4. CHAIRMAN, KARNATAKA KEERTI VIDYASAMSTE, BANKAPUR, TQ: SHIGGAON, DIST: HAVERI-581 202. Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5024 WP No. 104643 of 2023 5. PRINCIPAL, KEERTI PRE-UNIVERSITY, ARTS AND COMMERCE COLLEGE, BANKAPUR, TQ: SHIGGAON, DIST: HAVERI-581 202. 6. G.S. KUNDARAWADA, LECTURER, KEERTI PRE-UNIVERSITY ARTS AND COMMERCE COLLAGE, BANKAPUR, TQ: SHIGGAON, DIST: HAVERI-581 202. … RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER When the case is called, the petitioner is not represented, either personally or through video conferencing. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed before Registrar (P & H) and sufficient time was granted to comply with the office objections. Again the petition was listed before the Court and sufficient time was granted to comply with the office objections. Once again the petition was listed on 12.03.2025, on that day, finally a week’s time was - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5024 WP No. 104643 of 2023 granted to comply with the office objections, failing which the office was directed to list the petition under the caption ‘for dismissal of petition for non-compliance of office objections’ on 19.03.2025. The petition is listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal of petition for non-compliance of office objections’. Despite granting sufficient time, the petitioner has not complied with the office objections. As already noted above, when the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. In view of peremptory order dated 12.03.2025, the petition is dismissed for non-compliance of office objections and also for non-prosecution. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE RH LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 33