Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 44418 (CHH)

HARSH SABHARWAL v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/3326/2024 · 2025-03-07

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:11339-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 3326 of 2024 Harsh Sabharwal S/o Sh. Virender Kumar Sabharwal, Aged About 44 Years R/o 7/33 Ansari Road, Daria Ganj, Delhi-11002. ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer Of Police Station Tilda Nevra, District-Raipur (C.G.) 2 - SDOP, Tilda, District-Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Sh. Rajat Tejwani S/o Girdhari Lal Tejwani, Aged About 27 Years R/o Gurunanak Ward No.5, Post Office-Tilda-Nevra, District-Raipur (C.G.) ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr.Suresh Tandon, Advocate For Respondents No.1 and 2 /State : Mr.Shashank Thakur, Deputy Advocate General Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice and Hon'ble Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad, Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, C.J. 07/03/2025 1. Heard Mr.Suresh Tandon, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr.Shashank Thakur, learned Deputy Advocate General appearing for respondents No.1 and 2/State. 2. The petitioner has filed this petition under Section 528 of the BABLU RAJENDRA BHANARKAR Digitally signed by BABLU RAJENDRA BHANARKAR Date: 2025.03.10 10:19:06 +0530 2 Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 with following prayer:- “It is therefore prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to nullifying the FIR and subsequent criminal proceeding if any pending before the Investigation agency, P.S. Tilda-Nevra, Raipur, C.g. in FIR No.225/2023 and any other court to secure the ends of justice.” 3. It has been argued by learned counsel for the petitioner that the settlement deed (Annexure P-3) has already been arrived at between the petitioner and respondent No.3, hence, the proceedings of the present case be quashed. It is further stated that the investigation of the present case is still pending and no final report / closure report has been filed by the investigating officer. 4. In view of above, the parties are directed to appear before the investigating officer of the present case within a period of two weeks’ from today, who shall verify the compromise arrived at between the parties and submit an appropriate police report within a period of four weeks thereafter under Section 173(2) of the CrPC (Now Section 193(3) of the BNNS) before the Magistrate concerned. 5. With the aforesaid observation / direction, the present petition stands disposed of. Sd/- Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Bablu