KRISHNA KUMAR S/O SHRI GOPAL LAL v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/17040/2025 · 2025-11-21
Ashok Kumar Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44416 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44416 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:47325] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17040/2025 Krishna Kumar S/o Shri Gopal Lal, Aged About 76 Years, Resident Of Opp. Rajasthan Bank, Laxmi Nath Temple, Patanpol, Kota. ----Petitioner Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary To The Government, Medical And Health Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Director, Medical And Health Services, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 3. The Principal And Controller, Medical College, Kota. 4. The Superintendent, Maharao Bhim Singh Hospital, Kota (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Prahlad Singh For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 21/11/2025
1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:- i) The respondents may be directed to give the benefit of Pay Scale No.8 of trained Electrician to the Petitioner from date of his initial appointment revised from time to time and fixation accordingly be ordered to be made that the Respondents may further be directed to revise the three selection grades to the Petitioner after the fixation in the Pay Scale No.8. [2025:RJ-JP:47325] (2 of 2) [CW-17040/2025] ii) The Respondents may further be directed to revise the retrial benefits of the petitioner accordingly after fixation as mentioned above. Iii) The Respondents may be directed to pay entire arrears to the Petitioner of the above fixations, the revised three selection grades and retirement benefit with interest @18% from the date the same became due to the Petitioner. 2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits the petitioner may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents-Authority to consider and resolve his grievances. 3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents- Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to decide the representation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioners have provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he has a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of.
(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J GAURAV /66