SIDDAPPA S/O TAMMANNA KIRANAGE @ NAIK v. HARICHANDRA BHIMU DHANG
MFA/25287/2012 · 2025-04-07
Umesh M Adiga
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44414 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44414 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:6168 MFA No. 25287 of 2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMESH M ADIGA
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 25287 OF 2012 (MV-I)
BETWEEN:
SRI. SIDDAPPA S/O. TAMMANNA KIRANAGE @ NAIK, AGE 28 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE & COOLIE, R/O. AINAPUR, TQ: ATHANI, DIST: BELGAUM. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. K. H. BAGI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
HARICHANDRA BHIMU DHANG, SINCE DEAD BY HIS LRS.
SRI. MAHANTESH HARICHANDRA DHANG, AGE 25 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. ANKALI, TQ: CHIKKODI, DIST: BELGAUM.
2.
THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER, THE UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD, NO.4567, K. C. ROAD, 1ST FLOOR, NEAR PRABHAKAR TALKIES, CHIKKODI, TQ: CHIKKODI, DIST: BELGAUM. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. ARUNA DESHPANDE, ADVOCATE FOR R2;
NOTICE TO R1 IS SERVED)
THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED U/SEC.173(1) OF M.V ACT, SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 28.04.2012 PASSED BY LEARNED IV ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND MACT-V, BELGAUM IN M.V.C NO.2846/2011 AND GRANT COMPENSATION BY ALLOWING THIS M.F.A. WITH COSTS IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
Digitally signed by VISHAL NINGAPPA PATTIHAL Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:6168 MFA No. 25287 of 2012
ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMESH M ADIGA)
Advocate for appellant seeks two weeks time. Already sufficient time is granted. On the last date, i.e., 17.03.2025, one week’s time was granted on costs of Rs.1,000/-. When the case was posted again on 24.03.2025, there was no compliance. Further, costs as directed by this Court on 17.03.2025, is also not paid. There is no justifiable ground to adjourn the case. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for non prosecution.
Registry is directed to send back the records to the trial Court.
Sd/- (UMESH M ADIGA) JUDGE bvv /ct-an List No.: 1 Sl No.: 23