[2025:RJ-JP:47246] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19339/2024 Ram Prakash S/o Shri Kanhaiya Lal Banjara, Aged About 61 Years, Resident Of B-61, Jai Hind Nagar-1, Baran Road, Police Line, Kota. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Additional Chief Secretary, Department Of Home, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. The Director General Of Police, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 3. The Superintendent Of Police, District Kota Rural. 4. The Additional Superintendent Of Police, District Kota Rural. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Kumar Swami For Respondent(s) : Mr. Parth Sharma for Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 20/11/2025 1. The controversy in the writ petition is denial of grant of ACP on ground of penalty of censure. 2. Learned counsel for petitioner while placing reliance upon judgment in case of Raghuveer Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.: S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.20358/2018 submits that penalty of censure does not come in the way while consideration of candidature for grant of ACP to the petitioner by the respondents. He also placed reliance upon order dated 30.08.2024 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.2/2018 : Bhanwar Singh [2025:RJ-JP:47246] (2 of 2) [CW-19339/2024] Jakhad Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. decided by a Co- ordinate Bench at Principal Seat, Jodhpur. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of learned AAG candidly admits the case of present petitioner is squarely covered with judgment in case of Raghuveer Singh Vs. State (supra) and he submits that he has no objection in case, a direction is passed for consideration of case of petitioner based on ratio in said judgment for grant of ACP to the petitioner. 4. Having considered submission of learned counsel for the parties, and also on perusal of judgment in case of Raghuveer Singh Vs. State (supra) and Bhanwar Singh Jakhad Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. the respondents are directed to consider case of grant of ACP to the petitioner in light of judgment as referred hereinabove, ignoring penalty of censure, if ratio is applicable. Needless to say that compliance has to be made within 60 days from date of receipt of copy of the order. 5. With aforesaid, the instant writ petition and misc. application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MR/90