1109 2025 THURSDAY Court : MB-07 Item : AD-03 Status : DAI ID : 266057 AR : NANDY IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE WPA 23072 OF 2019 SANKAR GOSWAMI VS. STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS. MS. KAUSIKI BOSE, ADVOCATE ……for the Petitioner MR. RAJA SAHA, ADVOCATE MR. SANJAY MUKHERJEE, ADVOCATE ……for the Respondent No. 2 MR. SWAPAN KUMAR MAZUMDAR, ADVOCATE MR. SAPTARSHI MAZUMDAR, ADVOCATE ……for the Nabadwip Municipality 1. During the course of hearing, Mr. Mazumdar, learned Advocate representing the Municipality, produced certain documents, which are taken on record, and submits that the information had already been provided to the petitioner based on his application presented under Section 6 of the Right to Information Act, 2005. 2. The petitioner preferred first appeal and second appeal. 3. Mr. Mazumdar submits that both the appeals have been disposed of. 4. In view of such subsequent developments, the writ-petition has become infructuous. 5. Accordingly, WPA 23072 of 2019 is ‘dismissed as infructuous’. (PARTHA SARATHI CHATTERJEE, J.) P a g e | 2