Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI WEDNESDAY ,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSANDAND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE B S BHANUMATHI WRIT PETITION (AT) NO: 1290 OF 2021 Between: M Venkata Ratnam, S/o M.Ramanaiah, Aged 40 years, Presently working as Technical Assistant, O/o the Executive Engineer, G.R.P.Division No.2, Ongoie, Prakasam District. ...APPLICANT AND
1. The State Of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Water Resources Department, A.P. Secretariat Building, Velagapudi, Tulluru Mandal, Guntur District, 522001. The Engineer in Chief (Adrnn), Water Resource Department Ramavarappadu Vijayawada Krishna District, 522001. The Superintending Engineer, Construction Circle Ongoie Prakasam District, 523001. The Executive Engineer, G.R. P Division No. 11 Ongoie Prakasam District
523001.
2.
3.
4. ...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying jybat in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Cgurt, may be pleased to declare the action of the 2nd respondent * proceeding vide Memo. No. RC/ENC(1(1)/AbyT/2017-2 dated 2.11.2017 by • cancelling promotion orders dated 23.6.2017 of the applicant is illegal, arbitrary and set aside the same consequently direct the respondents to continue the applicant as Technical Assistant 'with all benefits. consequential Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. P MALLIKHARJUNA RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES III The Court made the following Order:
APHC010429752021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3311] Wednesday, the Twenty Third Day of April Two Thousand and Twenty Five Present The Honourable Ms Justice B.S.Bhanumathi Writ Petition Transfered From APAT No: 1290 of 2021 (O.A.No.3164 of 2017) Between: M.Venkata Ratnam ...Petitioner and The State of Andhra Pradesh and others Counsel for the petitioner: I.P.Mallikharjuna Rao Counsel for the Respondents: 1 .GP for Services III The Court made the following: ...Respondents
2 W,P(AT) No.1290 of 2021
Order: The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, seeking the following relief: ...to declare the action of the 2"^ respondent proceeding vide Memo.No.RC/ENC(1(1)/AbyT/2017-2 dated 2.11.2017 by cancelling promotion 23.6.2017 of the applicant is illegal, arbitrary and set aside the same consequently direct the respondents to continue the applicant as Technical Assistant with all consequential benefits...” orders dated
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner instructed to withdraw the petition. A photostat copy of the letter dated 21.04.2025 sent by the petitioner was submitted to the Registry. 3 Ms.C.Indrani, learned Assistant Government Pleader Services-lll is present.
4. As such, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. memo with for
5. Interim orders granted earlier, if any, shall stand vacated. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.
Sd/- M SraNIVAS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, ^ one CC to SRI p MALLIKHARJUNA RAO Advocate [OPUC] 2 TWO CCs to GP for SERVICES III, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 3 Three CD Copies Vna (gsg) I
r HIGH COURT \ DATED:23/04/2025
ORDER WP(AT).No.1290 of 2021 /o 2 fi S€P 2025 ^ =C m , c> V- DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS