Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4441 (CHH)

SHIV KUMAR SHARMA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/264/2019 · 2025-07-30

Shri Narendra Kumar Vyas

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:37609 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 264 of 2019 1 - Shiv Kumar Sharma S/o Late Shri Chudamani Sharma Aged About 47 Years R/o Gourella, Pendraroad, District - Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Principal Secretary Health And Family Welfare Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - The Deputy Director Directorate Health Services, Indrawati Bhawan, Iiird Floor, New Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - The Collector Bilaspur District - Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 4 - The Chief Medical And Health Officer Bilaspur District - Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 5 - The Block Medical Officer Community Health Centre Gourella, District - Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 6 - The Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenue) And President Jeevan Deep Samiti Gourella, District - Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 7 - Ganesh Singh S/o Asman Singh Aged About 24 Years R/o House No. 104, Gitanjali City, Phase - Ii, Bahtarai, District - Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioner : Ms. Jigyasa Tiwari, Advocate appears on behalf of Mr. Siddharth Pandey, Advocate For State : Mr. Kishan Lal Sahu, Dy. Government Advocate BHUMIKA ANGARE Digitally signed by BHUMIKA ANGARE Date: 2025.08.01 17:25:32 +0530 2 Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board 31.07.2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition in view of subsequent development taken place with liberty to file afresh petition if exigency so arises. 2. Prayer is allowed. 3. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty granted in favour of the petitioner. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Bhumika