SHRI SHRIRAM GOVERDHANDASJI AGRAWAL AND OTHERS v. M/S JAI BAJRANG PULSE AND OIL INDUSTRIES, BY ITS PARTNER, SHRI RAJENDRA G. AGRAWAL, AMT. AND OTH
CAO/5/2025 · 2025-01-24
Shri G A Sanap
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44409 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44409 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 14.CAO.05.2025+1.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
CIVIL APPLICATION (CAO) NO. 05 OF 2025 I N
C IVIL
APPLICATION (
C AO) NO. 106 OF 2024
IN MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION (ARBN) NO. 192 OF 2019 (D) Shriram Goverdhandasji Agrawal and others .vs. M/s. Jai Bajrang Pulse and Oil Industries and others WITH CIVIL APPLICATION (CAO) NO. 06 OF 2025 I N
C IVIL
APPLICATION (
C AO) NO. 107 OF 2024
IN MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION (ARBN) NO. 578 OF 2019 (D) Sumit Shriram Agrawal .vs. M/s. Raj Industries and others _______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders.
None for the applicants
Mr N. A. Lalwani, Advocate for respondent Nos. 2 to 4 in CAO No.05 of 2025 and for respondent
No.3 in CAO 06 of 2025
Mr K. S. Chiwarkar, Adv. h/f. Mr M. A. Vishwarupe, Advocate for respondent No.2 in both
applications CORAM :
G.A. SANAP
J.
DATE :
JANUARY 24, 2025
Heard.
2. These are the applications for speaking minutes.
3. It is submitted that in para Nos. 2 and 3 the name of arbitrator is wrongly mentioned as ‘Mr. Kishor D. Deshpande’ instead of ‘Kishor H. Deshpande’. Therefore, 2025:BHC-NAG:759
2 14.CAO.05.2025+1.odt learned advocates for the respondents requested to correct the same.
4. In view of the above, the application is allowed.
5. In para Nos.2 and 3 the name of arbitrator be corrected as ‘Mr. Kishor H. Deshpande’ instead of ‘Kishor D. Deshpande’.
6. The civil application stands disposed of, accordingly.
(G. A. SANAsP, J) Namrata