APHC010219282025 I IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI TUESDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE •'O ,c? '-i ■iD;l .i PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 4670 OF 2025 Between: Landa Ravi Kumar, S/o. Appalaswamy, Aged about 54 R/o. D.No.71-31-964, Visakhapatnam. years, Malkapuram, Chintalalova, Gandhigram ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED N0.1 AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court Buildings, Nelapadu, Amaravati. ...RESPONDENT Petition under Section 528 of BNSS, praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the XIII Additional District & Sessions Judge, Gajuwaka, to recall the Pw-8 for further cross examination to arriving at a just decision of the case. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 528 of BNSS, praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay on all further proceedings in S.C.No.17 of 2017 on the file of XIII Additional District & Sessions Judge, Gajuwaka. : SRI T M K CHAITANYA, ADVOCATE Counsel for the Petitioner Counsel for the Respondent : -- The Court made the following ORDER : / 1 HNJ Crl.P.No.4670_2025 APHC010219282025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) 0?^ [3457] TUESDAY ,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 4670/2025 Between: Landa Ravi Kumar ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1.TM KCHAITANYA Counsel for the Respondent/complainant: 1. 2 HN, J Crl.P.No.4670 2025 The Court made the following Order: The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is aggrieved by the order passed by the XIII Additional District and Sessions Judge Gajuwaka, dismissing Crl.M.P.No.347 of 2025 in dated 09.04.2025. further cross-examination. I 1. SC.No.17 of 2017 by order It is submitted that the petitioner sought to recall PW8 for 2. The learned District and Sessions Judge dismissed the petition on the ground that the petitioner has not specified the additions and contradictions be elicited from PW8, and that the matter to was posted for arguments. In the absence of specific of a specific purpose and the non-disclosure of the additions, contradictions, or omissions, the recall of PW8 would not arise. 3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. Perused the petition filed by the petitioner, which is vague and lacks details, particularly regarding why PW8 was sought to be recalled for cross-examination. 4. The role of PW8 is limited to filing the charge sheet, as the investigation was conducted by PW7. Therefore, the order passed by the XIII Additional District and Sessions Judge, Gajuwaka, cannot be faulted as it is a well- reasoned order. 5. On these grounds this Court is not inclined to interfere with this matter. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed. 3 HN,? Crl.P.No.4670__2025 As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, sj^^ll stand closed SD/- K.TATA RAO deputy REGfSTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1 ■ The XIII Additional District & Sessions Visakhapatnam. 2. One CC to Sri T.M.K. CHAITANYA 3. Two CC’s to the PUBLIC Pradesh [OUT] 4. Three CD Copies Judge, Gajuwaka Advocate [OPUC] PROSECUTOR, High Court of Andhra GPC TAC HIGH COURT DATED:29/04/2025 ORDER CRLP 4670/2025 of o 1 n SEP 2025 m. to; Current Section DISMISSING THIS CRLP