Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 44407 (RAJ)

VIRENDRA KUMAR @ BABLI S/O HAWA SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/13060/2025 · 2025-10-17

Anoop Kumar Dhand

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.13060/2025 Virendra Kumar @ Babli S/o Hawa Singh, R/o Jaguvas Police Station Sadar Behrod District Kotputli Behrod ( Raj.) ( At Present Confined In Sub Jail Kishangarh Bas) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sanjay Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia, Addl.GA/PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 17/10/2025 1. This bail application under Section 483 BNSS has been filed by the petitioner in connection with FIR No.160/2024, registered at Police Station Mundawar, District Khairtha-Tijara wherein he is charged for offences punishable under Sections 143, 307, 452, 387, 506 & 120B IPC, 3/25 and 5/27 of the Arms Act. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the instant case is case of no injury and the allegations of using firearm have been levelled against the co-accused Jeetu Khurampur. Counsel submits that co-accused persons namely Jeet Singh, Anish, Muniraj, Mohit Bensal, Shashikant, Manoj Kumar and Rakesh have been granted indulgence of bail by the different Co-ordinate Benches of this Court and the case of the petitioner is at par with them and trial will take its own time to (2 of 3) [CRLMB-13060/2025] conclude, therefore same indulgence of bail be granted to the petitioner as well. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application and submitted that the petitioner is a habitual offender and other criminal cases are pending against him, therefore, he does not deserve indulgence of bail. 4. Considering the arguments put forward by the learned counsel for the petitioner and looking to the fact that the instant case is case of no injury and the co-accused persons namely Jeet Singh, Anish, Muniraj, Mohit Bensal, Shashikant, Manoj Kumar and Rakesh have been granted indulgence of bail by the different Co-ordinate Benches of this Court and the case of the petitioner is at par with them and trial will take its own time to conclude and without expressing any opinion on merits and demerits of the case, I deem it just and appropriate to grant indulgence of bail to the petitioner under Section 483 BNSS. 5. Accordingly, this bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that accused-petitioner Virendra Kumar @ Babli S/o Hawa Singh arrested in connection with aforementioned FIR, may be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two surety bonds of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 6. However, in case the petitioner is found involved in committing and repeating the same offence again, the Public (3 of 3) [CRLMB-13060/2025] Prosecutor/Investigation Officer would be at liberty to move application for cancellation of bail before the jurisdictional Court. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J KuD/207