[2025:RJ-JP:43648] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16338/2025 Himani Saini D/o Shri Dinesh Kumar Saini, Aged About 30 Years, Resident Of Balchand Para, Near Prakash Talkies, Maliyo Ka Mohalla, Bundi (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Additional Chief Secretary, State Of Rajasthan, Rural Development Department, Govt. Secretariat, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. The Commissioner Egs, Mgnrega, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 3. The District Program Coordinator Cum Zila Collector, Bundi (Raj.) 4. The Chief Executive Officer Cum Additional District Program Coordinator Egs, Zila Parishad Bundi (Raj.) 5. The Development Officer Cum Program Officer, Panchayat Samiti Bundi, District Bundi (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. G.S. Gouttam For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 30/10/2025 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:- “(i) The Hon’ble Court may kindly be declare illegal action of the respondents by which the respondents not allowed to join the petitioner on the post of JTA in MGNREGA Scheme and unemployed to the petitioner; [2025:RJ-JP:43648] (2 of 3) [CW-16338/2025] (ii) Further may kindly be directed to respondents to allow to join duty to the petitioner on the post of JTA in Zila Parishad Bundi.” 2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that in pursuant to a public advt., petitioner was selected and appointed as Junior Technical Assistant on 01.12.2017 and further allotted Panchayat Samiti Anta, Dist. Baran for appointment on contractual basis. He further submitted that by order dated 16.08.2021, she was relieved for Dist. Bundi under a relocation policy and she has marked her attendance on 16.08.2021. He further submitted that thereafter the petitioner fell sick and due to sickness and bad health, she could not remain present on her duties but when she returned to duties, her attendance was not marked. He further referred order dated 02.02.2024 in SB CWP No.1665/2024 titled as Pawan Kumar Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. And submitted that the respondents have not decided her representation. 3. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, it is appropriate to dispose of the writ petition at this stage with liberty to petitioner to submit a fresh representation. 4. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to decide the representation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of [2025:RJ-JP:43648] (3 of 3) [CW-16338/2025] representation. After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in her representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, she has a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 5. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /106