IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (208-A) CWP-9945-2024 Date of Decision : August 19, 2025 Khurshid Ahmed .. Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others .. Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI Present: Mr. Ishnoor Singh, Advocate and Mr. Randeep Singh, Advocate, for Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Aman Mittal, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. Mr. Mohd. Arshad, Advocate, for respondent No.5. HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI J. (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that keeping in view the subsequent facts which have come into being, the petitioner has instructed that he is not interested in pursuing the present writ petition any further and the same may kindly be disposed of as such. 2. Ordered accordingly. (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE August 19, 2025 (VIKAS SURI) harsha JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No HARSHA RANI 2025.08.20 09:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document