Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 44389 (RAJ)

KRISHAN KUMAR S/O SHRI MEHAR SINGH v. SURGYANI SAINI S/O SHRI PHOOI CHAND SAINI

CMA/3019/2019 · 2025-10-06

Ganesh Ram Meena

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:40390] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 3019/2019 Krishan Kumar S/o Shri Mehar Singh, Aged About 21 Years, Resident Of Jaisinghpura, Tehsil Kotputli, District Jaipur Rajasthan ----Appellant Versus 1. Surgyani Saini S/o Shri Phooi Chand Saini, Resident Of Pritvipura, Tehsil Bansoor, District Alwar Rajasthan (Driver Of Vehicle Bearing No. Rj 22 Ua 0714) 2. Shri Phool Chand Saini S/o Shri Ramchander, Resident Of Pritvipura, Tehsil Bansoor, District Alwar Rajasthan (Registered Owner Of Vehicle Bearing No. Rj 22 Ua 0714) 3. Iffco Tokio General Insurance Company Limited, Branch Manager 34 Nehru Palace, New Delhi (Insurer Of Vehicle Bearing No. Rj 22 Ua 0714) ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr. K.I. Khan on behalf of Mr. Rahul Tiwari For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 06/10/2025 The Court vide order dated 22.03.2024, condoned the delay in filing the appeal subject to depositing the cost of Rs.3,000/- by the appellant with the Rajasthan State Legal Services Authority, within a period of three weeks from the date of order i.e. 22.03.2024. As per the office report, the appellant has not deposited the cost amount till date that is even after a lapse of a period of about [2025:RJ-JP:40390] (2 of 2) [CMA-3019/2019] one and a half year, though, the order was to deposit the cost amount within a period of three weeks. In view of default of payment of cost, as directed by the Court vide order dated 22.03.2024, the present civil misc. appeal is dismissed. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /36