SUNIL MAROTHA S/O RAMESH MAROTHA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/13738/2025 · 2025-11-07
Pramil Kumar Mathur
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44388 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44388 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:44785] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13738/2025
1. Sunil Marotha S/o Ramesh Marotha, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Banjara Basti, Sumelganj Mandi, Indragarh, P.s. Indragarh, District Bundi. (Confined In Sawai Madhopur Jail)
2. Manoj Marotha S/o Hansraj Marotha, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Daulatpura, Ps. Indragarh, District Bundi. (Confined In Sawai Madhopur Jail) ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Hemant Kankoriya For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 07/11/2025
1. The petitioners have filed this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.282/2025 registered at Police Station Mantown District Sawai Madhopur for offence under Section 303(2) of BNS-2023.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the allegation against the present petitioners is that they have committed theft of a motorcycle. It is submitted that though ten cases pending against the present petitioners but present case is triable by Magistrate. The petitioners are in judicial
[2025:RJ-JP:44785] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-13738/2025] custody since 16.09.2025, and the charge-sheet has been filed. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners in further custody and the bail application of the petitioners may be allowed.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in the light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioners but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners.
6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioners-Sunil Marotha S/o Ramesh Marotha and Manoj Marotha S/o Hansraj Marotha be released on bail provided they furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial with following further conditions:- (i) that the petitioners shall mark their presence before the SHO, Police Station Mantown District Sawai Madhopur in every 15 days of each month till conclusion of trial. (ii) The concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register for this purpose. In case, the petitioners fails
[2025:RJ-JP:44785] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-13738/2025] to mark their presence in the concerned Police Station as directed above, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to trial court in this regard. (iii) If breach of any of the directions is reported or come to the notice of the trial court the same shall alone be a reason for learned Public Prosecutor to apply for cancellation of bail.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/41