Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:73331-DB Court No. - 40 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 12138 of 2025 Petitioner :- Nitesh Kumar Gupta Respondent :- Union Of India And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Amresh Bahadur Tiwari,Ashok Kumar Upadhyay Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,C.S.C.,Komal Mehrotra Hon'ble Shekhar B. Saraf,J. Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Sri Punit Agarwal, learned counsel, who has filed his vakalatnama on behalf of the respondent Nos.2 to 4. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the writ petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated November 6, 2024 passed by the respondent authority. 3. Upon perusal of the impugned order, we find that sufficient reasons have been provided by the respondent authority in rejecting the complaint of the petitioner. Furthermore, the complaint filed by the petitioner, which is at page No.37 of the writ petition, is simpliciter a bunch of allegations, without having been provided any proof thereof by the petitioner. 4. In light of the same, we do not see any reason to interfere in the writ petition at this stage. 5. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed. Order Date :- 7.5.2025 Kuldeep (Dr. Y.K. Srivastava, J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf, J.) Digitally signed by :- KULDEEP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad